knowing the action(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]S[x(t)]=\int_0^\infty dt'\left[\frac{m}{2}\left(\frac{dx}{dt'}\right)^2-V(x)\right][/tex]

After the so-called wick's rotation[tex]t'=-i\tau[/tex] with [tex]\tau[/tex] being real,

the action becomes

[tex]S[x(t)]=i\int_0^\infty d\tau\left[\frac{m}{2}\left(\frac{dx}{d\tau}\right)^2+V(x)\right][/tex]

my question is why the upper limit of the integral in the secong equation is still [tex]\infty[/tex]?

I think ist should be [tex]+i\infty[/tex]

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Wick rotation is consistent with caculus?

Loading...

Similar Threads - Wick rotation consistent | Date |
---|---|

Performing Wick Rotation to get Euclidean action of scalar f | Jan 24, 2016 |

The Wick rotation in position space | Apr 30, 2015 |

Moments of a Distribution via Laplace Transforms and Wick Rotations | Jun 17, 2014 |

Trouble with Wick rotation in 1+1d abelian Higgs model | Mar 29, 2013 |

Wick rotation and Minkowski/Euclidean space | Feb 10, 2013 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**