Wikipedia error about the complementary error function?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 3K views
AxiomOfChoice
Messages
531
Reaction score
1
Take a trip over here and explain to me what is meant by taking the double factorial of [itex]-1[/itex]. If you try to let [itex]N = 1[/itex] in the remainder formula, you wind up having to take [itex](2(0) - 1)! = (-1)![/itex], right? This strikes me as a typo; should it be changed? If so, to what?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you look at the page for double factorial, they note that for odd integers it can be expressed as

[tex](2k-1)! = \frac{(2k)!}{2^k k!}.[/tex]

Setting k = 0 gives (-1)! = 1. The original formula is derived for k > 0, but one can take the formula to work for k = 0 by convention, I guess.
 
So I'm guessing that if I set [itex]N = 1[/itex], then what we have is

[tex] \text{erfc}(x) = \frac{e^{-x^2}}{x \sqrt \pi} + O \left(x e^{-x^2} \right) \quad \text{as $x\to \infty$}.[/tex]

Can anyone confirm this?