Will Chicago Miss Out on the Olympics in 2016?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jtbell
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the potential selection of Chicago as the host city for the 2016 Olympics, with participants exploring various factors influencing the decision, including logistical challenges, economic implications, and the historical context of Olympic hosting. The conversation touches on the broader implications of hosting the Olympics in different countries and the associated costs and benefits.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note the difficult entry requirements for foreign visitors to the U.S. as a significant factor in the decision-making process for Olympic hosting.
  • Concerns are raised about the financial implications of hosting the Olympics, with some arguing that it can lead to debt rather than profit for the host city.
  • Participants discuss the historical trend of wealthy countries hosting the Olympics multiple times, questioning the fairness of this pattern.
  • There are differing opinions on whether the Olympics bring lasting benefits to the host city, with some asserting that infrastructure improvements are a positive outcome, while others highlight the potential for abandoned facilities post-event.
  • Some express skepticism about the ability of cities like Chicago to handle the influx of visitors during the Olympics due to existing overcrowding and traffic issues.
  • The timing of the Olympics in relation to the seasons in the host country is questioned, particularly regarding Rio's winter season during the summer Olympics.
  • Concerns are raised about the sustainability and future use of Olympic venues, citing examples of facilities that have fallen into disrepair after the events.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing views on the implications of hosting the Olympics, the economic impact, and the logistical feasibility of Chicago as a host city. Participants express differing opinions on the benefits and drawbacks of the Olympics for both the host city and the international community.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various assumptions regarding economic benefits, infrastructure development, and the long-term viability of Olympic venues, indicating that these factors are not universally agreed upon and may depend on specific circumstances.

  • #31
mgb_phys said:
Both Athens and Sydney are spending millions maintaining empty facilities. London is still spending millions on the millenium dome that has been empty since 2000, so that will at least get some use.
Evo said:
I was reading recently about financial problems with the upkeep of China's "birdnest" stadium. They just don't have events to book it. It's already falling into disrepair.

Here's a link that discusses some issues.

http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Beijing+Olympic+venues+host+white+elephant-a01611957209

Not good predictions for the London event either.

http://www.reuters.com/article/sportsNews/idUSTRE56033U20090701
With the preparations for the Olympics in China I heard about Australia apparently hurting and predictions that China may suffer a similar fate.

Apparently the initial income and profit from the games is huge but the resulting after game downturn in the local economy can be devastating especially after the major investment in such a short term economic spike.

Argentum Vulpes said:
Doesn't this definition net every single politician in DC?

Also there is a bigger issue, why is the president of the US wasting time to go give a speech in front of the IOC? There are much more pressing matters for his time back here in the US. We are still in two wars, the entire heath care debate, a enormous national debt, cap and trade, and a crumbling economy. Unless he solved all of these problems before he left so has nothing better to do with his time, and tax money.
He spent a matter of a few hours there from what I hear. And many a president has commented on an apparent increased ability to get work done on Air Force One with the lack of interruption that comes from being in DC.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
13K
Replies
42
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K