Will Compressed Air Increase the Danger of a Car Fire?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential effects of compressed air in a car during a fire scenario, particularly focusing on whether the release of compressed air from a ruptured tank would exacerbate or mitigate the fire caused by leaking gasoline. The scope includes theoretical considerations, safety implications, and speculative scenarios related to combustion and pressure vessel behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Speculative reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that a ruptured compressed air tank could explode, turning the tank into shrapnel, while others argue it may not positively affect an existing fire and could potentially extinguish it.
  • A different scenario is proposed where the escaping air atomizes gasoline, possibly creating conditions for a fuel-air explosive.
  • Participants note that the outcome depends on various factors, including the nature of the rupture and the size of the fire at the moment of rupture.
  • Some argue that a rupture could fan the fire by directing heat and providing more oxygen, while others question the likelihood of an explosion based on past experiments, such as those conducted by Mythbusters.
  • There is a discussion about the composition of compressed air and the conditions under which it might release oxygen, with some suggesting that it could either help or hinder the fire depending on the circumstances.
  • One participant shares a personal anecdote about a helium cylinder accident, emphasizing that while cylinders can withstand high pressures, they can also cause dangerous situations if they fail.
  • Another participant expresses frustration with the speculative nature of the discussion, suggesting that experimentation is necessary to find definitive answers.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no consensus reached on whether compressed air would increase the danger of a car fire. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing hypotheses and scenarios presented.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of the scenario, including variables such as the type of rupture, the size of the fire, and the conditions under which the air is released. There are also uncertainties regarding the effects of compressed air on combustion dynamics.

newbieny
ok guys here is the scenario:
a moving car at an arbitrary speed carrying a cylinder of compressed air on the trunk. A car crashes into the rear of the car causing a fire mixed in with the leaking fuel from the gas tank. The tank ruptures on impact and releases the air..will this air make the explosion bigger and the fire worse?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Well, the tank can explode like any pressurized vessel, the gas forcing its way out and turning the tank into shrapnel.

But as far as the existing fire goes, it will have no positive effect and may even blow it out, the way you blow out a candle.
 
I can imagine a different scenario where the expanding air suddenly freed from the cylinder atomizes the gasoline from the car creating the conditions for a fuel-air explosive.
 
The scenario you give still has too many variables to give a simple and direct answer. Either situation could be plausible depending on how the vessel ruptures.

Although a gasoline fire would be much harder to blow out than a candle, it is probably the most likely to happen given how the vessel is ruptured from a collision instead of overpressurization of the vessel itself.

You would have to take into account the size of the fire when the vessel ruptures, how it ruptures (referring to how the escaping pressurized air is directed in relation to the fire and the size of the rupture vs pressure in the vessel), if the rupture causes shrapnel that can be affect the fire, etc. All this makes it, IMO, and poor problem to try and answer directly.
 
Try it. See what happens.
 
What type of compressed air tank rupture? Compressed air tanks won't necessarily release all they have at once. A rip in the tank, large crack, broken fitting, etc. could simply fan the fire which of course directs the heat as well as make it hotter by providing more oxygen.
 
Averagesupernova said:
What type of compressed air tank rupture? Compressed air tanks won't necessarily release all they have at once. A rip in the tank, large crack, broken fitting, etc. could simply fan the fire which of course directs the heat as well as make it hotter by providing more oxygen.
I think you're right. Mythbusters couldn't get one to explode by putting a bullet hole in it in their effort to recreate the finale of the movie Jaws.

IIRC they did get a fire extinguisher to explode by putting it in the middle of a bonfire. Maybe an air tank would explode under extreme heat. Or maybe the pipe fitting would blow off first, turning it into a rocket.
 
zoobyshoe said:
I think you're right. Mythbusters couldn't get one to explode by putting a bullet hole in it in their effort to recreate the finale of the movie Jaws.

IIRC they did get a fire extinguisher to explode by putting it in the middle of a bonfire. Maybe an air tank would explode under extreme heat. Or maybe the pipe fitting would blow off first, turning it into a rocket.
Sounds like the safety factor is too high to allow it - that a regular air tank is able to withstand pressures MUCH higher than its operating pressure.
 
guys all are great answers..

what exactly is compressed air comprised of? and when ruptured what will it release ?
 
  • #10
newbieny said:
guys all are great answers..

what exactly is compressed air comprised of? and when ruptured what will it release ?

If it's simply supplied by an air compressor then it is the same composition as the air you would be breathing, compressed to much higher density. Breathing air should be free of oil from the compressor, but if this is say an air suspension for a car, I have no idea of the quality of compressor used and whether or not there could be a substantial amount of oil in the tank. I'd ignore that for your little thought experiment.

What will be released is exactly what you have, air. The oxygen content is not higher, but because the pressure inside the tank is much higher, when it ruptures there is bunch of air (and therefore ~21% oxygen) that has to distribute itself. The only way you would cause a larger fire is if the "rupture" provided oxygen to the fire faster than it could naturally draw it in. This is the case that a few people are mentioning. There is also a delicate balance where the chemical reaction can be disrupted.

This is the reason that a simple specific answer can't be given. The tank would have to "rupture" in a way to provide more air to the fire without impeding the reaction to allow the fire to get bigger. That means you have a specific set of circumstances that must be met or at least pre-defined in your question to answer it with any definity. That pretty much kills your original general question.

IMO, using pressures from typical breathing air cylinders (~3000 psig) I would say that chances would be more in favor of snuffing out a direct flame or completely dispersing the flammabe material (gasoline), instead of making the fire larger.
 
  • #11
russ_watters said:
Sounds like the safety factor is too high to allow it - that a regular air tank is able to withstand pressures MUCH higher than its operating pressure.

It depends. A colleague of mine was involded in an accident a few years ago where he and another guy were using a helium cylinder (to transfer liquid helium). The other guy knocked the cylinder over and the regulator came off when it hit the floor; this turned the cylinder into a rocket (albeit not airborne) and it made a hole in one of the internal walls (luckily no one was hurt).
Cylinders can tolerate quite high pressures, but when they break bad things can happen and they can certainly explode if the ambient temperature gets high enough.
 
  • #12
Wow, 11 speculation replies on a nonsense post. Science at its finest here.

Sorry to be rude, but this thread should just stop. We can all talk about the answers to this question to death, and no one is any closer to the truth than the next post.

Moral of the story: Do the experiment, find out for yourself.

Anything otherwise is speculation.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
Cyrus said:
Moral of the story: Do the experiment, find out for yourself.
Um, what exactly are you suggesting here...?
 
  • #14
Don't worry, I told him to make sure he's in the trunk (Someone has to hold the tank).
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 117 ·
4
Replies
117
Views
11K
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K