Will LQG explain the constants?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential of Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) to explain the values of fundamental constants in physics, such as the fine-structure constant and the cosmological constant. Participants explore the Cosmic Natural Selection (CNS) principle proposed by Lee Smolin, which suggests that these constants may be optimized for the reproduction of black holes, thereby influencing the structure of the universe.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the CNS principle offers a falsifiable model for explaining the values of fundamental constants without relying on anthropic reasoning.
  • Others argue that the formation of black holes could lead to variations in physical constants, analogous to genetic mutations, which may enhance the universe's reproductive fitness.
  • A later reply questions the implications of the CNS principle, noting that it may be proven wrong if observations contradict its predictions, such as finding neutron stars exceeding Smolin's upper mass limit.
  • Participants discuss how the fine-structure constant's value allows for a rich chemistry, which is essential for star formation and, consequently, black hole production.
  • Some express caution regarding the theoretical implications of LQG, suggesting that it may reveal limitations of current physical laws and that constants may not remain constant under extreme conditions.
  • Concerns are raised about the need for further work to determine which constants are relevant to black hole formation and whether their observed values align with predictions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and skepticism regarding the CNS principle and its implications. While some find the idea intriguing and potentially valuable, others highlight significant uncertainties and the possibility of observational challenges that could undermine the theory.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the need for further theoretical work to clarify which constants are relevant to black hole formation and the potential for observational evidence to contradict the CNS principle. Additionally, the discussion acknowledges that the relationship between black holes and the universe's constants may not be straightforward.

  • #91
I asked because I don't have $100 to spend on a textbook right now, even if its a classic that I've skimmed in a college bookstore a few times and longed to buy. Being a professor doesn't pay nearly as well as being a full time practicing lawyer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #92
ohwilleke said:
I asked because I don't have $100 to spend on a textbook right now, even if its a classic that I've skimmed in a college bookstore a few times and longed to buy. Being a professor doesn't pay nearly as well as being a full time practicing lawyer.

we are both in the same boat Ohwilleke, sorry to say. But we must both be close to university libraries! Let's both get over to the physics departmental library and look this up----I just have secondhand references too and it is not really satisfactory.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
16K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
10K