Why Are Wing Mounted Engines Positioned Close to the Fuselage?

  • Thread starter Thread starter claytonh4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Engine Position
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Wing-mounted engines on aircraft are strategically positioned closer to the fuselage to mitigate structural stress and flutter concerns. This placement minimizes effective drag area and enhances airflow, which is crucial for performance. In scenarios where a four-engine aircraft operates on only two engines, the inboard engines are preferred for symmetrical thrust and easier control. Additionally, the positioning relates to the natural frequencies of the wing structure, where engines are ideally placed at node points to reduce harmonic vibrations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of aircraft structural dynamics
  • Familiarity with aerodynamic principles
  • Knowledge of engine placement effects on aircraft performance
  • Basic concepts of harmonic vibrations and natural frequencies
NEXT STEPS
  • Research aircraft structural dynamics and stress analysis
  • Explore aerodynamic design principles for wing-mounted engines
  • Study the impact of engine placement on aircraft control and performance
  • Learn about harmonic vibrations and their effects on aircraft structures
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, aircraft designers, aviation students, and anyone interested in aircraft performance and structural integrity.

claytonh4
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
I've noticed on a/c with only two wing mounted engines that they tend to be closer to the fuselage than the wing tip. There must be some reason for this, and so I guess my question is why? Does having them farther out on the wing create too much stress? I would assume if a/c manufacturers could put the engines closer to the wing tip they would (for cabin quietness/comfort) so it must be a structural thing. If a four engine a/c was forced to run on just two engines (one on each side), would they then rather have the two closest engines running, or the two outward engines?
Thanks for any answers!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The reasons are mainly stress and flutter concerns (harmonic vibration with a weight at the end of a cantilever). But there are other reasons as well which include minimizing effective drag area, sucking in more air, stuff like that.
 
Another issue is the ability to fly a two engine plane with one engine failed. The further the engine is from the aircraft center line, more rudder control input is needed to fly straight, and drag force from the rudder is greater. The plane still needs some capability to make a turn with the working engine on the "inside" of the turn, though turning with the engine on the "outside" is much easier (and without any other contraints, you would probably fly a 270 degree turn the "easy" way rather than making a 90 degree turn the "hard" way).

A four engine plane can be flown on either the inboard or outboard pair of engines. In fact if a plane like a B747 needs to be make a flight with one engine failed (for example to ferry the plane to somewhere with maintenance facilities) the takeoff is usually done on two engines not all three working ones, to keep the thrust symmetrical.
 
To expand on the vibration (harmonic response) part. All structures have a series of frequencies (natural frequencies) at which the displacement is a maximum. For eample, if I vibrate a ruler with one end attached to my desk, different frequencies will result in different deflections. The largest ones are called natural frequencies. The shape of a structure at these frequencies are called mode shapes and they kind of look like sin waves.

So say you've done simulations to determine the natural frequencies of a plane wing. You might find that one of the natural frequencies of the wing is close to the likely operational frequency. For example, 2Hz for a car. One of the ways to overcome this (and an effective one) is to place the motor at one of the node points along the mode shape of this frequency. Picture the node as any point where y=0 on a sin wave.

This is just one of the things to consider when designing a wing.
 
Thank you for the answers, everyone!

AlephZero said:
Another issue is the ability to fly a two engine plane with one engine failed. The further the engine is from the aircraft center line, more rudder control input is needed to fly straight, and drag force from the rudder is greater.

And this is a good point about twins. I hadn't taken into consideration possible single engine ops.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
15K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K