With which speech goes the Mass through the Equilibrium?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem concerning the speed of a mass at equilibrium, with references to energy equations related to kinetic and potential energy. The original poster initially miscommunicates the question, leading to confusion about the terminology used.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between energy forms at different points in a system, questioning the relevance of specific values like height in the context of the problem. There is also a focus on clarifying the original question after a translation error.

Discussion Status

The conversation has evolved from confusion over terminology to a clearer understanding of the problem's context. Some participants have expressed that they have found solutions, while others are still seeking clarity on the details involved.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a translation issue affecting the understanding of the problem, and the original poster's reference to specific energy values raises questions about their significance in the overall analysis.

wiegetz
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


With which speed goes the Mass through the Equilibrium?

Homework Equations


Es = 1/2*D*s2
Ekin = 1/2*m*v2
Epot = m*g*h

Energy in the zero point = below/ under

highest Point: Epot = 1kg * 9,81N/kg*0.67m
≈ 6.573Nm

Equilibrium : Ekin, Epot, Es

Lowest Point: Es= 0 Ekin = 0, Epot = 0

The Attempt at a Solution


I have no Idea what I have to do. I found out that the total Energy needs to be approx. 6,573Nm of the system.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your problem statement makes no sense.

What speech? What equilibrium?
 
Sorry, I ment speed, not speech. The question is asked on a different language, so I tried to translate it. According to google, the correct meaning should be "
Thermodynamic equilibrium

"
 
wiegetz said:
Sorry, I ment speed, not speech. The question is asked on a different language, so I tried to translate it. According to google, the correct meaning should be "
Thermodynamic equilibrium

"
OK, things are a little clearer now. But what about the particulars of this problem? What does 0.67 m have to do with anything?
 
I solved this problem. I needed to insert the given data simply into the formula, I thought that this attempt would be too simple. Can be marked as solved!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
898