Without prefix: Can area be negative?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Miike012
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area General
Click For Summary
The discussion clarifies the concept of negative area in relation to integrals of functions. It explains that the integral of a function can yield a negative value when the function is below the x-axis, but this does not imply that the physical area itself is negative. Instead, the net area is defined as the difference between positive and negative areas under the curve. An example involving electric current illustrates that while the integral can be zero over a complete cycle, the areas above and below the x-axis can cancel each other out. Understanding this definition is essential for interpreting integrals in various contexts.
Miike012
Messages
1,009
Reaction score
0
In the book it says that if f is say positive in [a,b) and negative from (b,c] where f(x) is continuous on [a,c]. Letting the area of [a,b) = A1 and (b,c] = A2 then the net area is
A1 - A2.

Question: This does not make sense to me... how can area be negative? For instance what if f < 0 in its entire domain [a,b] then its entire area is negative?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If f<0 and you integrate it over [a,b] you will get the negative of the area between the curve and the x-axis. That's what they mean. That the integral will be negative. Not the area.
 
Miike012 said:
In the book it says that if f is say positive in [a,b) and negative from (b,c] where f(x) is continuous on [a,c]. Letting the area of [a,b) = A1 and (b,c] = A2 then the net area is
A1 - A2.

Question: This does not make sense to me... how can area be negative?

It's just a matter of definition. The definition of the "area under the curve" over an inteval is in terms of the integral of the function over that interval, which can come out negative or positive.

Miike012 said:
For instance what if f < 0 in its entire domain [a,b] then its entire area is negative?

Yes, the entire area would be negative.

Granted, this is sometimes a very useful definition. For instance what if the electric current at a point in space as a function of time is given by i(t) = I0sin(ωt)? What would be the net amount of charge passing across that point in space over one period of the sine function? Ans: This would be given by q(t) = ∫i(t)dt = 0. Just by glancing at the function over an interval equal to one period, you can see that the current spends just as much time in the positive direction as in the negative direction. The area under the first half is positive, and the area under the second half is negative and equal to the first area in magnitude, meaning that just as much charge flowed past the point from left to right in the first half as flowed from right to left in the second half, and the net flow was 0.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K