Women are better at just about everything

  • Thread starter Thread starter DanP
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Women
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the assertion that women excel in various areas compared to men, touching on topics such as driving, map reading, and reflexes. Participants debate the validity of claims made by author Dan Abrams, who suggests women outperform men in many fields, including video games. While some acknowledge women's advantages in certain skills, others argue against the blanket statement that women are better at everything, citing individual differences and the importance of recognizing strengths and weaknesses within genders. The conversation also veers into humorous territory, with light-hearted jabs about traditional gender roles and capabilities, such as cooking and driving. Overall, the thread reflects a mix of admiration for women's abilities and skepticism about generalizations regarding gender superiority.
  • #51
I thought Ms. Pac-Man was the targeted game... if not... why make it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
nismaratwork said:
Wow.. she has absurdly well-built traps and shoulders... I guess going a million Mph around a track will do that!

hard to say, but they do fan out a bit. shoulders, can't tell, they're hidden. what i see is she's very lean, compensated for with silicon.
 
  • #53
Proton Soup said:
hard to say, but they do fan out a bit. shoulders, can't tell, they're hidden. what i see is she's very lean, compensated for with silicon.

Yeah... I'm really REALLY REALLY not a fan of implants... and nothing says, "I have a hole where my self-esteem should be" like pushing your fake breasts together for GoDaddy. :rolleyes:

Hell, in my view she's not even pretty... just somewhat healthy.
 
  • #54
She's not pretty compared to whom? You sir must be a beautiful man with very high standards :smile:
 
  • #55
Zryn said:
She's not pretty compared to whom? You sir must be a beautiful man with very high standards :smile:

I didn't say she's ugly... she's... plain. Her face is a little square, and she never looks... genuine.

Pretty and beautiful often occur in the absence of being "hot", but we all know which lasts. My standard is in the face above all, not that a hot body doesn't rile me up too... it's just not enough, or required.

As for me... yeah... "I'm like Zeus in a Speedo." :wink:
 
  • #56
Hell, in my view she's not even pretty... just somewhat healthy.

Antonyms by Answers.com:
pretty

adj

Definition: attractive
Antonyms: disgusting, plain, ugly

http://www.answers.com/topic/pretty"

I misread the context of your statement, taking it too literally. Perhaps being relegated to plain and not pretty instead of hot has left a gaping hole where her self esteem used to be.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #57
Zryn said:
Antonyms by Answers.com:
pretty

adj

Definition: attractive
Antonyms: disgusting, plain, ugly

http://www.answers.com/topic/pretty"

I misread the context of your statement, taking it too literally. Perhaps being relegated to plain and not pretty instead of hot has left a gaping hole where her self esteem used to be.

:smile:

Maybe having to be some kind of sex symbol instead of just a NASCAR driver did it? I have no clue, her self-esteem is probably great, and she just wants the money... who knows.

In the end, my point is that regular healthy features alone do not pretty make... it's just youthful health, not lasting. Look at a woman like Helen Mirren... now, she's FAR too old for me, and I don't find her attractice, but she's beautiful.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #58
ROTFL at the OP.

another BS attempt to promote feminism. Hww many nobel prizes in physics have women gotten?

game over
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #59
Curl said:
ROTFL at the OP.

another BS attempt to promote feminism. Hww many nobel prizes in physics have women gotten?

game over

You don't know DanP very well... do you?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top