Writing: Read Only Wordlbuilding Detail with Roots in Science

  • Thread starter Thread starter sbrothy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravitational
Click For Summary
Gravitational waveforms from warp drive collapse have been studied, revealing potential signatures from containment failures using a stiff equation of state. The research highlights the feasibility of simulating warp drives within general relativity, despite practical challenges like the need for negative energy. The emitted gravitational-wave signals and energy fluxes of the fluid are analyzed, contributing to the understanding of spacetimes that violate the null energy condition. Additionally, a design for radiation shielding in interplanetary travel is proposed, utilizing a superconducting magnetic field to protect against cosmic radiation. This innovative shielding could also generate power and thrust, suggesting a self-sufficient mobile station for future space exploration.
sbrothy
Gold Member
Messages
1,296
Reaction score
1,178
What no one has seen before: gravitational waveforms from warp drive collapse

Despite originating in science fiction, warp drives have a concrete description in general relativity, with Alcubierre first proposing a spacetime metric that supported faster-than-light travel. Whilst there are numerous practical barriers to their implementation in real life, including a requirement for negative energy, computationally, one can simulate their evolution in time given an equation of state describing the matter. In this work, we study the signatures arising from a warp drive "containment failure", assuming a stiff equation of state for the fluid. We compute the emitted gravitational-wave signal and track the energy fluxes of the fluid. Apart from its rather speculative application to the search for extraterrestrial life in gravitational-wave detector data, this work is interesting as a study of the dynamical evolution and stability of spacetimes that violate the null energy condition. Our work highlights the importance of exploring strange new spacetimes, to (boldly) simulate what no one has seen before.

Didn’t dare post this anywhere but here.

:smile:

EDIT: Just for the record I’m not out to ridicule here. I don’t have the prerequisite education for that. I do, on the other hand, hope you’ll agree it is a little farfetched. For the time being. Also the author obviously has a sense of humor.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Magnetic Shielding for Interplanetary Travel

A proposed design for radiation shielding in interplanetary travel is presented with primary shielding created by a superconducting split toroid magnetic field and unconfined magnetic fields created by two deployable superconducting loops. The split toroid's shielding effectiveness is analyzed with calculations of mass, field, particle path, and synchrotron radiation provided. The creation of plasma regions is also taken into consideration. The design has a wire mass of 8.08x10^4 kg, which creates a 0.47 T shielding field, and a field less than 2.17x10^-4 T in the crew area. Calculations show the shielding field deflects concerning particles of solar wind, solar flares, and high energy high atomic number particles found in galactic cosmic radiation. This design might also be used to generate power and thrust from the radiation to create a potentially self-sufficient mobile station.
 
I’m working on a sci-fi novel and part of the process is building a consistent story world. While the plot includes magical and fantastical elements, I want the underlying “rules of the world” to be scientifically accurate wherever possible. My goal is to make sure the physics and technical details I use don’t contradict established science. Would this forum be an appropriate place to ask for help reviewing specific quantum mechanical ideas for technical accuracy, or is there a better venue...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
795
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
608