- 15,877
- 9,045
Wordle 1,094 3/6















This forum discussion centers around the daily Wordle game from the New York Times, specifically Wordle 393 and 395. Participants share their results and strategies, highlighting the importance of word selection and guessing techniques. Users mention starting words like 'EARLY', 'PIOUS', and 'ADIEU' as effective openers. Additionally, the conversation touches on the game's timing, noting that Wordle updates at midnight local time, which can vary based on users' time zones.
PREREQUISITESWord enthusiasts, casual gamers, and anyone looking to improve their Wordle performance or explore similar word-based games.
If you want, I can post everyones scores from game 660 on.fresh_42 said:Boys, I need your vectors!
https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...-nyt-daily-game.1016903/page-128#post-7096756
I feel lonely among those cracks who never fail.
That data is clearly biased though so it is not as informative as getting the actual numbers from people.OmCheeto said:If you want, I can post everyones scores from game 660 on.
I'll take that as a no.Orodruin said:That data is clearly biased though so it is not as informative as getting the actual numbers from people.
Well, up to @fresh_42 who asked for the data, but I would assume significant bias towards solutions with lower guesses just based on my own anecdotal experience. Even if not intentional, I feel much more inclined to share “good” results. If I solve it right after midnight and make a soso attempt, I might just go to sleep instead of jumping onto PF to share. In fact, it happened just last night:OmCheeto said:I'll take that as a no.
I publish bad results on purpose. I hope it makes the others feel better and motivates them to do better. My fails have many different reasons. Sometimes I lacked concentration, sometimes patience, sometimes they were words I did not think they qualify (literally German words, comic speak, or simply out of my vocabulary).Orodruin said:Even if not intentional, I feel much more inclined to share “good” results.
All I am saying is people will have whatever reasons not to publish and that this will bias the data. Therefore data collected from this thread will invariably come with bias.fresh_42 said:I publish bad results on purpose.
Sed ad vere confundenda, computatro opus est.fresh_42 said:Errare humanum est.
This would open up an interesting thread about statistics and testing hypotheses.Orodruin said:All I am saying is people will have whatever reasons not to publish and that this will bias the data. Therefore data collected from this thread will invariably come with bias.