- 20,815
- 28,452
Wordle 1,089 6/6






























This thread centers around the daily Wordle game from the New York Times, where participants share their results, strategies, and experiences. The discussion includes personal anecdotes, strategies for guessing words, and reflections on the game's impact on cognitive skills.
Participants express a variety of opinions and experiences regarding strategies and the nature of the game, with no clear consensus on the best approaches or the implications of playing Wordle on cognitive skills.
Some discussions involve assumptions about the game's rules and the validity of word guesses, which may not be universally agreed upon. There are also references to personal experiences that may not apply to all players.
This thread may be of interest to fans of word games, particularly those who enjoy sharing strategies and results, as well as those curious about the social dynamics of competitive gameplay.
gmax137 said:a hard one for me, not sure why
Wordle 1,089 5/6
![]()
game 1,089 | |
attempts to solve | global players |
4 | 41.5% |
5 | 28.7% |
3 | 20.7% |
6 | 6.2% |
2 | 2.6% |
failed | 0.3% |
1 | 0.0% |
I have argued with myself whether using spreadsheets or other such aids is a form of cheating and I decided that it is not. In this case, cheating (or lack thereof) is in the mind of the beholder. I think of "cheating" as gaining unfair advantage over others by not following the rules in a game or competition.OmCheeto said:Some people question this method as being the equivalent of cheating, and I concur.
I only cheat by looking up whether a word has already been used. I don't consider this cheating since I could theoretically know it anyway. I also observed that my expectation value tends to increase. I am still at ##(\mu\, , \,\sigma)=(4.092\, , \,1.087)## which is better than the ##4.2## in the early days. But it's getting harder since natural guesses have already been used and the words become less common (deter, manga, etc.)gmax137 said:Wordle 1,090 5/6
I've had way too many 5's lately. I wonder if maybe "cheating" is something I should look into. OTOH, if I did that, I would worry too much about it. That would ruin the fun.
I have drawn the line, for myself, at the point where the spreadsheet and its concomitant algorithms cease to be a bookkeeper and start becoming an advisor or, even worse, a decision-maker. This means that, without asking for suggestions, I get to choose the next trial word after the spreadsheet presents me with a list of possible candidates for the target solution. The next trial word, not necessarily one of the candidates, is strictly my choice.jack action said:Question 4: Is executing a Python code I wrote to solve the puzzle automatically online using my VBA code to facilitate the search and then posting it on PF automatically cheating?
Answer 4: No, because writing such code is just facilitating what I would have done manually anyway. The only problem is that although it exercised my brain while coding, there is no point in executing the code after it is written.
Question 5: Is executing a daily CRON job while I sleep, to run a Python code I found online to solve the puzzle automatically online and then posting it on PF automatically cheating?
Answer 5: Maybe not, but what would be the point?