Work and Volume in Adiabatic Expansion

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the final volume and work associated with the adiabatic compression of 1.60 mol of H2 gas, initially at 21°C and 1.50 atm, to a final pressure of 4.50 atm. The ideal gas law (PV=nRT) and the first law of thermodynamics are central to the calculations. The participants clarify that for adiabatic processes, the equation P1V1^γ = P2V2^γ is applicable, where γ is the heat capacity ratio. The correct approach involves using differentials and integrating the equations without substituting numerical values prematurely.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the ideal gas law (PV=nRT)
  • Knowledge of adiabatic processes and the first law of thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with calculus, particularly integration and differentials
  • Concept of heat capacity (Cv) and its role in thermodynamic calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the adiabatic process equation P1V1^γ = P2V2^γ
  • Learn how to apply the first law of thermodynamics to adiabatic processes
  • Practice integrating thermodynamic equations without substituting values
  • Explore the implications of heat capacity ratios in gas behavior during compression
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in thermodynamics, particularly those studying gas laws and adiabatic processes, as well as anyone involved in engineering or physical sciences requiring a solid understanding of energy conservation in thermodynamic systems.

ScreamingIntoTheVoid

Homework Statement


A sample of 1.60 mol H2 (Cv = 20.5 J K-1 mol-1) at 21°C and 1.50 atm undergoes a reversible adiabatic compression until the final pressure is 4.50 atm. Calculate the final volume of the gas sample and the work associated with this process. Assume that the gas behaves ideally.

Homework Equations


pv=nRT
p1v1=p2v2
ΔE=-peternalv=nCvΔT

The Attempt at a Solution


pv=nRT → (1.5 atm)(V0=(1.6 mol)(0.08206 atm mol K)(294 K)
V0=25.734016 L (tried this initially as I was given Cv, but that was wrong)
P1V1=P2V2→(1.5 atm)(25.734016 L)=(4.5 atm)(V) →8.57800533 L (which was wrong)

ΔE=-(4.5)(17.1501067)= -77.202 J (nope)
ΔE=(1.6 mol)(20.5 K mol)(294 K)= 9643.2 J (Nope)

I'm not really sure where I went wrong with this, any input would be really helpful
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is the process isothermal, or is it adiabatic?
 
Chestermiller said:
Is the process isothermal, or is it adiabatic?
Adiabatic
 
ScreamingIntoTheVoid said:
Adiabatic
For an adiabatic reversible process, is this equation correct: p1v1=p2v2 ?
 
Chestermiller said:
For an adiabatic reversible process, is this equation correct: p1v1=p2v2 ?
That's what I wrote in my notes at least. I suppose not though?
 
ScreamingIntoTheVoid said:
That's what I wrote in my notes at least. I suppose not though?
You suppose correctly. Do you know the correct equation? It can be derived by applying the 1st law of thermodynamics to this adiabatic reversible compression. What would the 1st law give you for this?
 
Chestermiller said:
You suppose correctly. Do you know the correct equation? It can be derived by applying the 1st law of thermodynamics to this adiabatic reversible compression. What would the 1st law give you for this?
The first law of thermodynamics would be conservation of energy, which would be Internal Energy=Q+W. Since it's an adiabatic system, Energy would just be equal to work. E=p deltaV and nCv delta T... Right?
 
ScreamingIntoTheVoid said:
The first law of thermodynamics would be conservation of energy, which would be Internal Energy=Q+W. Since it's an adiabatic system, Energy would just be equal to work. E=p deltaV and nCv delta T... Right?
Yes! Except that, because the process is reversible, those deltas should be d’s. That is, differentials. And there should be a minus sign. Now substitute p=nRT/V into the equation. What does that give you?
 
Do you mean the volume value I calculated before or the actual equation itself?
E= -(4.5 atm) (d/dv 25.734016 L) =...
E= nRT/v x d/dv V -> E= nRT d/dv
(I'm sorry I lost momentum here I'm unsure what to do.)
 
  • #10
What I'm saying is $$nC_vdT=-\frac{nRT}{V}dV$$ Does this equation make sense to you?
 
  • #11
Chestermiller said:
What I'm saying is $$nC_vdT=-\frac{nRT}{V}dV$$ Does this equation make sense to you?
I thought I did but based on what I came up with it seems I've shamed my calculus teacher

∫nCvdt=-∫nRT/v dV → nCvT1-nCvT2=-(nRT)ln(V1)-(nRTln(V2)
So if I plug what I know
(1.6 mol)(20.5 J K-1 mol-1)(294K) - (1.6 mol)(20.5 J K mol)(T2)=-[(1.6)(8.315)(294)ln(25.734016 L)-(1.6)(8.315)(294)(lnV2)]

-3060.220545=(1.6 mol)(20.5 J K mol)(T) - (319.296)(ln (25.734016 L/ V2)

So I'm assuming this is super wrong?
 
  • #12
This is not integrated correctly. And, please stop substituting numbers. Do it all algebraically.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K