Calculating Work Done by a Spring with Initial Compression

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating the work done by a spring when it is initially compressed, specifically in the context of a 2-kg block supported by a spring with a spring constant (k) of 40 N/m. The maximum velocity of the block is determined using energy conservation principles, where the kinetic energy (E_k) is expressed as E_k = (1/2)kx_0^2 - (1/2)kx^2 - mg(x - x_0). The critical condition for maximum velocity occurs when the net force is zero, leading to the equation mg = kx. The discussion also addresses common sign errors in the equations related to spring forces and work done.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hooke's Law and spring constants
  • Familiarity with kinetic and potential energy equations
  • Basic knowledge of calculus, particularly derivatives
  • Concept of net force and its relation to motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of energy conservation in spring systems
  • Learn about the implications of sign conventions in physics equations
  • Explore work integrals and their applications in mechanics
  • Investigate advanced topics in oscillatory motion and damping effects
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those preparing for exams in mechanics, as well as educators looking for examples of energy conservation in spring systems.

AngelofMusic
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Hello!

Sorry I've got so many questions lately. Studying for a midterm right now. Anyway, I've been trying to solve problems involving springs, and I'm getting confused about calculating the work done by a spring when its initial state is already in compression.

The question: A 3-kg block rests on top of a 2-kg block supported by but not attached to a spring with k = 40N/m. The upper block is suddenly removed. Determine the maximum velocity and the maximum height of the 2-kg block.

I figured that the maximum velocity would occur before the block flew off the spring, and probably before it returned to its unstretched length.

In equation: T1 + U1->2 = T2

U1->2 = 1/2k(x1)^2 - 1/2k(x2)^2, where x1 and x2 are measured from the unstretched length of the spring.

I calculated x1 = 1.22625 m. So:

0 + 30.07 J - 1/2k(x2)^2 = 1/2mv^2

Taking the derivative and setting it to zero:

-k(x2)=0, which isn't correct. How am I supposed to approach this problem? I think my equation for work done by the spring is incorrect, but I don't know what it is supposed to be.

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's a couple of options:

A clever option is to realize that the velocity is maximal when the net force on the block is zero, so when mg=kx and then use energy.

Alternatively, you can calculate the Kinetic Energy as a function of position:
E_k=\frac{1}{2}kx_0^2-\frac{1}{2}kx^2-mg(x-x_0)
then take the derivative and set it to zero since the kinetic energy is maximal when the velocity is maximal.
kx-mg=0
so
mg=kx (have I seen this equation before?)
x=\frac{mg}{k}

You could also calculate an expression for the velocity, take a derviative, and then work your way back, but it's not nearly as nice in this case:
v=\sqrt{\frac{2}{m}(\frac{1}{2}kx_0^2-\frac{1}{2}kx^2-mg(x-x_0))
for velocity as a function of position.
 
Thanks for your help!

Just a quick follow-up on the signs of the equations. When you have:

E_k=\frac{1}{2}kx_0^2-\frac{1}{2}kx^2-mg(x-x_0)

Wouldn't the result be:

-kx - mg = 0

This is always a confusing point for me. I never know when the spring force is considered negative/positive, and whether the work done is negative or positive.

In this case, the spring is going back towards its original position, so I'd say it's positive. How does that translate numerically into the equation?

E_spring = \frac{1}{2}kx_0^2 - \frac{1}{2}kx^2

Since it was originally compressed by 1.22625 m, x_0 = -1.22625 and x = 0.4905 when I set mg = kx. Since the values are squared, though, I'm still getting a negative since the x values are sqared.
 
Oh the maximum velocity is definitely at:
x=-\frac{mg}{k}
since the other solution with x>0 is not in the domain where the function is meaningfull.

I had a sign error. Good question/catch.

I'm not sure if you've seen work integrals but essentially, the work can be described as
W=\int \vec{F}_{net} \dot{} v dt
and if you use the same coordinate system for everything, you'll get the correct sign.

Alternatively, work done by forces in the same direction as the velocity is positive, and work done by forces opposing the velocity is negative.

Regading the math, even with the sign error:
(x_0^2-x^2) > 0

Here's what I get using approximations:
x_0=-1.2 (Negative since down is negative)
x_{vmax}=-.5
now
x_0^2=1.44
x_{vmax}^2=.25
so
v_{max}=\frac{2}{2} \sqrt{\frac{1}{2}40(1.19) - mg(-.7)}
v_{max}=\sqrt{23.8-14}=\sqrt{10}
so I get
v_{max}=3
or so.
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K