Work done by a variable force question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving the calculation of work done by a variable force as represented by a graph of force versus displacement for an object of mass 3.0 kg. The original poster seeks to determine the total work done on the object as it moves from x = 0 to x = 7, while questioning the implications of their result in relation to the work-energy theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the integration of the force function to find total work and the interpretation of this result in the context of the work-energy theorem. There is a focus on whether a negative work value violates the theorem, particularly given the initial conditions of the object.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring the implications of the calculated work value and its relationship to kinetic energy. Some participants are questioning the interpretation of the negative work and its effect on the final velocity of the object, while others are clarifying the application of the work-energy theorem.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the areas under the force versus displacement graph to calculate work, noting the presence of both positive and negative force values. There is an emphasis on the initial condition of the object starting from rest and the implications of the calculated work on the final kinetic energy.

Catalytical
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



246kgu9.jpg


That's a graph of Force in Newtons (y axis) vs displacement in meters (x axis) for an object of mass 3.0kg that is moving along the x-axis and initially starts at rest. I am being asked to find the total work done on the object as it moves from x = 0 to x = 7.


Homework Equations



Net Work = ∫F dx = ΔK
K = 1/2mv^2

The Attempt at a Solution



So, I integrated the function and ended up with a total work of -.5J. What I want to know is if this violates the work-energy theorem or not. If the net work is equal to change in kinetic energy, and the object starts at rest, this would mean that -.5 = 1/2mv^2. Is there something really obvious that I'm missing here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
work done (energy) = area under F against x graph (this is another way of seeing ΔK = ∫F.dx
There are 2 clear areas to calculate... when F is +ve and when F is -ve
 
By calculating the areas I got total work = -0.5J
 
So, I integrated the function and ended up with a total work of -.5J. What I want to know is if this violates the work-energy theorem or not. If the net work is equal to change in kinetic energy, and the object starts at rest, this would mean that -.5 = 1/2mv^2. Is there something really obvious that I'm missing here?

Can you explain why you think the work-energy theorem is violated?

0.5=\frac{1}{2}mv^{2}_{f}-\frac{1}{2}mv^{2}_{i}

If the object started at rest, the last term is 0 and you get

0.5=\frac{1}{2}mv^{2}_{f}

which just says that the object has some final velocity.
 
CanIExplore said:
Can you explain why you think the work-energy theorem is violated?

0.5=\frac{1}{2}mv^{2}_{f}-\frac{1}{2}mv^{2}_{i}

If the object started at rest, the last term is 0 and you get

0.5=\frac{1}{2}mv^{2}_{f}

which just says that the object has some final velocity.

Right, but if the total work done is -.5, wouldn't that mean that
-0.5=\frac{1}{2}mv^{2}_{f}
I'm not sure why you ignored the sign on the work done.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
886
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K