Work done negative and positive

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of work in physics, particularly focusing on the implications of positive and negative work in relation to kinetic energy and friction. The original poster seeks clarification on their understanding of how friction affects work done on an object.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between work, kinetic energy, and friction, questioning how energy is transferred in different scenarios. There is a focus on the definitions of positive and negative work and how they relate to energy transfer into or out of an object.

Discussion Status

Some participants express agreement with the original poster's interpretation of work done by friction, while others raise concerns about the accuracy of describing energy transfer as heat. The discussion is ongoing, with multiple interpretations being explored regarding the nature of work and energy in the context of friction.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of differing perspectives on how work done by friction is defined in various physics textbooks, indicating a potential gap in understanding or terminology that may affect the discussion.

MBBphys
Gold Member
Messages
55
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I was just wondering whether the following notes I took on work in physics are accurate? Or have I got my understanding wrong?
Note on friction

Following from the example of the dragging object above…

The object stops because it loses kinetic energy due to friction.

How does the friction force do work?

Ok, so I push an object, then let go; I have transferred kinetic energy to it.

Now it moves a certain distance in a direction opposite to friction force acting on it.

So, in W=Fd, F will have a negative sign as it is in the opposite direction; the magnitude of F is the magnitude of the friction force.

Hence, energy transferred will come out with a negative sign.

What does that mean?

The W=Fd formula tells you that if you move something with a force, you are transferring some energy INTO THAT OBJECTàthe fact that W is negative here is because the point of application of force is losing energy; the kinetic energy of the object is being transferred out as heat energy (primarily), BECAUSE THE FORCE IS ACTING OPPOSITE TO THE DIRECTION OF MOVEMENT.

If W has a positive sign, that means we are transferring energy INTO the object the force is acting on to make it move; if W is negative, energy is being transferred out.

Thanks; your help would be much appreciated! :)

Homework Equations


N/A

The Attempt at a Solution


N/A
 

Attachments

  • friction.png
    friction.png
    41.6 KB · Views: 553
Physics news on Phys.org
What you have described is how I look at it: positive (negative) work occurs where kinetic energy is transferred to (from) the object.
 
andrewkirk said:
What you have described is how I look at it: positive (negative) work occurs where kinetic energy is transferred to (from) the object.
Thank you! :)
 
MBBphys said:
the kinetic energy of the object is being transferred out as heat energy (primarily), BECAUSE THE FORCE IS ACTING OPPOSITE TO THE DIRECTION OF MOVEMENT.


If you want to treat the friction force as a force that does negative work and thus decreases the kinetic energy of an object, that is fine as far as that goes. But saying that the energy is transferred out of the object as heat energy is a problem. The fact is, some of the kinetic energy lost by the object does appear as internal energy outside the object, but some of it appears as internal energy inside the object. That is, an increase in temperature of both the object and its surroundings is observed.

These increases in internal energy are associated with increases in temperature, but they are not associated with a transfer of heat energy.

This is the reason that some introductory physics textbooks do not speak of work done by friction. They are trying to develop a dynamical definition of work that's consistent with the thermodynamic definition. If you describe situations where kinetic energy is dissipated as work done by friction you cannot have a definition of work that generalizes to work done in thermodynamic processes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
687
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K