Work/Energy equation on inclined plane

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving work and energy on an inclined plane, specifically focusing on a cyclist descending a slope and the forces acting on them. The problem presents a scenario where the cyclist freewheels down a slope and then travels on a horizontal surface, with the goal of determining the constant resisting force acting against them.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the calculation of the slope's angle and its implications on the problem. There is discussion about the potential energy and forces acting on the cyclist, with some questioning the use of sine and cosine in their calculations. Others suggest working symbolically rather than numerically to simplify the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and clarifications regarding the problem setup. Some have offered guidance on how to approach the calculations without needing to determine the angle explicitly. There is recognition of the confusion surrounding the relationship between resistive force and velocity, with some participants attempting to clarify this aspect.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of working with constant resistance and the implications of the problem's parameters, such as the grade of the slope and the total distance traveled. There is an acknowledgment of the original poster's struggle with the problem, highlighting the iterative nature of their attempts to understand the situation.

shaunchattey
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
I've been trying to work out what I'm doing wrong on this question but I just don't get it.

'A cyclist starting from rest freewheels for 120m down a slope of 1 in 30. At the bottom of the slope the road becomes horizontal, and the cyclist stops without using his breaks after going a further 40m. If the total mass of the bicycle and rider is 72kg, find the resisting force, assumed constant'

From what I could find 1 in 30 grade is 3.75 a degree decline.

Potential energy= (mgh)72*10*sin(3.75)(120)
Force of gravity over distance(mgs) = 72*10*cos(3.75)(120) + (72*10*40)
Force over distance vs resistance over distance = 72*10*sin(3.75)-R*(72*10*cos(3.75)*120) + (72*10*40) = Crazy wrong answer.

I've been unable to figure this one out for quite a while, I occasionally go back to it. This is just one of many incorrect answers I've ended up with.
(The answer given in the book is 18N)

I've also tried working backwards to find the forces of gravity from knowing the resistance is 18N, didn't help, ended up with ridiculously small numbers.

Help.
Shaun.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
From what I could find 1 in 30 grade is 3.75 a degree decline.

Check that. I think you worked out the slope in % not degrees.
 
CWatters said:
Check that. I think you worked out the slope in % not degrees.

h=1 s=30
(h=1*4) /(s=30*4) = 4/120 = height of 4m

y4/x120 = 0.03 inv Tan(0.03) 1.7 degrees?
 
shaunchattey said:
h=1 s=30
(h=1*4) /(s=30*4) = 4/120 = height of 4m

y4/x120 = 0.03 inv Tan(0.03) 1.7 degrees?
There is no point in calculating the angle. You are given the sine of the angle (1/30), and you will only be needing trig functions of the angle. They can all be determined directly from the sine without ever knowing the angle in degrees. This will make for less work as well as improving precision.
Good technique is to work the problem entirely symbolically, ##\theta## for the angle etc., until you have a formula for the answer. Only then should you plug in numbers.
 
haruspex said:
There is no point in calculating the angle. You are given the sine of the angle (1/30), and you will only be needing trig functions of the angle. They can all be determined directly from the sine without ever knowing the angle in degrees. This will make for less work as well as improving precision.
Good technique is to work the problem entirely symbolically, ##\theta## for the angle etc., until you have a formula for the answer. Only then should you plug in numbers.

My issue wasnt so much that but I don't know how to work out the resistance without the velocity, and I can't find the velocity without the resistance, and I am unsure how to deal with the energy situation without one of those in this situation. I've been over this same question now so many times I've lost perspective on it.

*It would help if someone could show me their working on this question.
 
Last edited:
shaunchattey said:
My issue wasnt so much that but I don't know how to work out the resistance without the velocity, and I can't find the velocity without the resistance, and I am unsure how to deal with the energy situation without one of those in this situation.
You don't need velocity as the resistive force is constant.
The work done by the resisting force must be equal to the initial energy, so:

mgh = Fd

where d = 120m + 40m, and F is the only unknown
 
shaunchattey said:
My issue wasnt so much that but I don't know how to work out the resistance without the velocity.
You didn't mention that in the OP.
shaunchattey said:
From what I could find 1 in 30 grade is 3.75 a degree decline.

Potential energy= (mgh)72*10*sin(3.75)(120)
Force of gravity over distance(mgs) = 72*10*cos(3.75)(120) + (72*10*40)
why did you switch from sin to cos?
 
shaunchattey said:
h=1 s=30
(h=1*4) /(s=30*4) = 4/120 = height of 4m
y4/x120 = 0.03 inv Tan(0.03) 1.7 degrees?

As haruspex said, you don't actually need the angle but it would be a lot simpler to just do

Angle = Sin-1(1/30) = 1.9 degrees.
 
billy_joule said:
You don't need velocity as the resistive force is constant.
The work done by the resisting force must be equal to the initial energy, so:

mgh = Fd

where d = 120m + 40m, and F is the only unknown

Billy joule sorted it for me, thanks guys, I've been struggling on this one for a long time.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: billy_joule
  • #10
haruspex said:
You didn't mention that in the OP.

why did you switch from sin to cos?
Because I'm stupid and it was late!
Yeah I should have been more clear but I actually wasnt sure about the grades either(obviously) but you guys cleared both up.
You have no idea how much I got stuck on this question, I've never had to ask for help on a physics question before I just couldn't figure out what I was supposed to do despite having done many work energy equations before! I think it was the fact I read 'constant resistance' but I didn't take it into account, I kept trying to figure out the varied resistance like an idiot.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K