Projectile motion on an inclined plane

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves projectile motion on an inclined plane, where a ball is thrown with an initial speed up the plane at a specific angle. The inclined plane is set at an angle of π/6 to the horizontal, and the questions focus on the time the ball remains in the air and the angle of launch required for the ball to strike the plane perpendicularly.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using a rotated reference frame to analyze the motion, with matrix transformations to express coordinates. There are attempts to apply kinematic equations to find the time of flight and to determine the angle for perpendicular impact. Questions arise regarding the validity of assumptions about the time of impact and the conditions for perpendicularity.

Discussion Status

Some participants have made progress in formulating their approach, particularly for part (a), while still grappling with the implications of their methods for part (b). There is a mix of ideas being explored, with some guidance offered on the interpretation of conditions for impact.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the requirement to use rotated reference frames as specified by the professor, which influences their problem-solving strategies. There is also an acknowledgment of the absence of air resistance in the problem setup.

danyull
Messages
9
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A ball is thrown with initial speed v0 up an inclined plane. The inclined plane makes an angle of π/6 above the horizontal line and the ball is launched at an angle θ above the inclined plane. No air resistance in this problem.
(a) How long does the ball stay in the air?
(b) At what angle θ should the ball be launched in order to fall back on the plane normal to the inclined surface?

Homework Equations


Newton's laws and kinematics equations?

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried making a rotated reference frame (expressed as a matrix transformation below) centered at the launch point where $$ \begin{pmatrix} x' \\ y'
\end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} \cos(π/6) & \sin(π/6) \\ -\sin(π/6) & \cos(π/6) \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} x \\ y \end{pmatrix} \\
\begin{pmatrix} x' \\ y' \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} \frac {\sqrt{3}} 2 & \frac 1 2 \\ - \frac 1 2 & \frac {\sqrt{3}} 2 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} x \\ y \end{pmatrix}
$$
and since the force of gravity is ##\vec {\mathbf F} = -mg ~ \hat y##, then in the new reference frame $$ F_x' = \frac {\sqrt{3}} 2 F_x + \frac 1 2 F_y = - \frac 1 2 mg \\ F_y' = - \frac 1 2 F_x + \frac {\sqrt{3}} 2 F_y = - \frac {\sqrt{3}} 2 mg$$
and acceleration ##a_x'## and ##a_y'## will just be the above two forces with mass divided out.

From here on I'm a bit stuck. As for part (a), I want to use the kinematic equations with my given initial velocity. At first I thought to solve for the time it takes to reach the peak of its trajectory and then multiplying by 2, but I realized that would be the time it takes to hit the ground if the inclined plane weren't there. My next guess was solving for the time when the horizontal velocity reached zero since in this reference frame there's a negative horizontal acceleration, but I'm not sure that would be the exact time that the ball hits the inclined plane.

Any help would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
danyull said:

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried making a rotated reference frame (expressed as a matrix transformation below) centered at the launch point where $$ \begin{pmatrix} x' \\ y'
\end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} \cos(π/6) & \sin(π/6) \\ -\sin(π/6) & \cos(π/6) \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} x \\ y \end{pmatrix} \\
\begin{pmatrix} x' \\ y' \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} \frac {\sqrt{3}} 2 & \frac 1 2 \\ - \frac 1 2 & \frac {\sqrt{3}} 2 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} x \\ y \end{pmatrix}
$$
and since the force of gravity is ##\vec {\mathbf F} = -mg ~ \hat y##, then in the new reference frame $$ F_x' = \frac {\sqrt{3}} 2 F_x + \frac 1 2 F_y = - \frac 1 2 mg \\ F_y' = - \frac 1 2 F_x + \frac {\sqrt{3}} 2 F_y = - \frac {\sqrt{3}} 2 mg$$
and acceleration ##a_x'## and ##a_y'## will just be the above two forces with mass divided out.
OK. That's a very formal way to do it, but it works! You could also just project the acceleration due to gravity along your x' and y' axes.

From here on I'm a bit stuck. I want to use the kinematic equations with my given initial velocity. At first I thought to solve for the time it takes to reach the peak of its trajectory and then multiplying by 2, but I realized that would be the time it takes to hit the ground if the inclined plane weren't there.
Right.

My next guess was solving for the time when the horizontal velocity reached zero since in this reference frame there's a negative horizontal acceleration, but I'm not sure that would be the exact time that the ball hits the inclined plane.
Your idea that the x'-component of velocity should be zero at impact might be right for part (b). But your reason for stating that doesn't make sense to me. Keep in mind that for part (b) you want the ball to hit the incline perpendicularly to the incline.

For part (a), think about the coordinates of the point of impact in your primed coordinate system.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: danyull
Thanks for your input! My professor wants us to practice rotated reference frames using matrix transformations, hence this homework problem.

I think I figured out part (a). I just used the equation ##y' = v_{0,y}' t + \frac 1 2 a_y' t^2## and set it equal to 0, then solve for ##t##. I'm still working out part (b).
 
Last edited:
danyull said:
I think I figured out part (a). I just used the equation ##y' = v_{0,y}' t + \frac 1 2 a_y' t## and set it equal to 0, then solve for ##t##. I'm still working out part (b).
Good. (Forgot to type the square on the t in the last term?)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: danyull
Ah, right I did. Thank you!

I believe I have the second part too now. I'll just set ##\vec {\mathbf r}' \cdot \hat {\mathbf y} = 0## because the dot product is zero when the vectors are orthogonal. The x-component drops out, and the position ##y'## will be from the equation I just used, evaluated at the time that I solved for.
 
danyull said:
I believe I have the second part too now. I'll just set ##\vec {\mathbf r}' \cdot \hat {\mathbf y} = 0## because the dot product is zero when the vectors are orthogonal.
So, you are saying that the position vector is perpendicular to the y'-axis at impact? (I'm interpreting ##\vec {\mathbf r}'## to be the position vector in the primed frame with origin at the launch point.) Wouldn't that always be true for any impact location on the plane (even if the ball does not hit perpendicularly to the plane)?

The x-component drops out, and the position ##y'## will be from the equation I just used, evaluated at the time that I solved for.
But you already know that ##y'## will be zero at impact.

Try to formulate the idea that the ball is moving perpendicular to the inclined surface at impact.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: danyull
Oops, yeah I realized that wouldn't work after trying it. Do you think I could set ##\vec {\mathbf v}' \cdot \hat {\mathbf x}' = 0## instead? Evaluating the velocity at the time I solved for, the vector points "down" in the coordinate system, which is perpendicular to the coordinate's unit vector x. Then I solve for θ.
 
danyull said:
Oops, yeah I realized that wouldn't work after trying it. Do you think I could set ##\vec {\mathbf v}' \cdot \hat {\mathbf x}' = 0## instead? Evaluating the velocity at the time I solved for, the vector points "down" in the coordinate system, which is perpendicular to the coordinate's unit vector x. Then I solve for θ.
Yes, sounds like a good plan.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: danyull

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K