Work/Energy Problem: Maximum Height of Daredevil on Motorcycle

  • Thread starter Thread starter myelevatorbeat
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The maximum height of a daredevil on a motorcycle can be calculated using the conservation of energy principle. The initial speed of the motorcycle is 39.0 m/s, and the speed at the peak is 36.8 m/s. The correct formula to determine the height is derived from the kinetic energy (KE) and potential energy (PE) relationship, specifically: (KE_initial - KE_final = ΔPE). The vertical component of the velocity at the peak becomes zero, allowing for the calculation of height without resolving into components.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservation of energy principles in physics
  • Familiarity with kinetic and potential energy equations
  • Basic knowledge of projectile motion
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the conservation of energy in mechanical systems
  • Learn to apply kinetic energy and potential energy formulas in problem-solving
  • Explore projectile motion and its equations
  • Investigate the effects of angles on projectile trajectories
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the mechanics of motion and energy conservation in real-world applications.

myelevatorbeat
Messages
55
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A daredevil on a motorcycle leaves the end of a ramp with a speed of 39.0 m/s as in Figure P5.23. If his speed is 36.8 m/s when he reaches the peak of the path, what is the maximum height that he reaches? Ignore friction and air resistance.



The Attempt at a Solution



I figured I would start by finding the height when he is going off the ramp so I did this:

V^2=Vo^2-2g(Y-Yo)
39^2=0^2-2(9.80)(Y-Yo)
and wound up with
(Y-Yo)=-77.6 m

I'm not sure if I'm doing this correctly because I got a negative height. Should I just get rid of the negative sign and use this as my height?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You shouldn't just get rid of the negative sign, because the number is not right either. You didn't even use 36.8m/sec in your solution. What makes you think it doesn't matter?
 
Vijay Bhatnagar said:
Correct solution is as follows : The initial velocity Vo (36.8 m/s) can be resolved into x and y components : Vo(x) = Vo cos (theta) and Vo(y) = Vo sin (theta) where theta is the angle made by the ramp with the horizontal. At the highest point, only the vertical component of velocity becomes zero (Vo(x) remains constant throughout). Substituting V = 0, Vo = Vo sin(theta), a = -g in V^2 - Vo^2 = 2a(Y - Yo) we get

-Vo^2 [sin(theta)]^2 = -2g (Y - Yo)

(Y - Yo) = Vo^2 [sin(theta)]^2/2g

Hope this helps.

You don't need to resolve it into components. In fact, I think this is where the OP went wrong. In this problem the equation being used expresses conservation of energy. The energies only depend on the difference in the magnitudes of the velocities and the vertical displacement.
 
The initial velocity Vo (39 m/s) can be resolved into x and y components : Vox = Vo cos (theta) and Voy = Vo sin (theta) where theta is the angle made by the ramp with the horizontal. At the highest point, the vertical component of velocity becomes zero. The horizontal component Vox remains constant throughout as there is no force acting on the motor cyclist in that direction. Thus, at the highest point Vox = Vo cos(theta) = 36.8 m/s. Solving get theta. Substituting Vy = 0, Vo(y) = Vo sin(theta), a = -g in Vy^2 - Voy^2 = 2a(Y - Yo) solve for (Y - Yo).

Hope this helps.
 
Vijay Bhatnagar said:
The initial velocity Vo (39 m/s) can be resolved into x and y components : Vox = Vo cos (theta) and Voy = Vo sin (theta) where theta is the angle made by the ramp with the horizontal. At the highest point, the vertical component of velocity becomes zero. The horizontal component Vox remains constant throughout as there is no force acting on the motor cyclist in that direction. Thus, at the highest point Vox = Vo cos(theta) = 36.8 m/s. Solving get theta. Substituting Vy = 0, Vo(y) = Vo sin(theta), a = -g in Vy^2 - Voy^2 = 2a(Y - Yo) solve for (Y - Yo).

Hope this helps.

You are correct that you CAN do it that way. But you can also do it without solving for theta using the formula presented by the OP. The only problem is that the OP is not using it right.
 
Dick said:
You don't need to resolve it into components. In fact, I think this is where the OP went wrong. In this problem the equation being used expresses conservation of energy. The energies only depend on the difference in the magnitudes of the velocities and the vertical displacement.

This can be an alternative approach : KE at the highest point - KE at the end of the ramp = Change in PE . I agree this is the better approach.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K