Work, force and displacement directions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the physical feasibility of a force vector F = 160N x - 40N y acting on a displacement vector s = 14m x + 11m y. The negative y-component of the force suggests a downward direction, while the positive y-component of the displacement indicates an upward movement. The scalar product method yields a work result of 1800J. The conversation highlights that additional forces or initial momentum could explain the apparent contradiction in directions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector components in physics
  • Knowledge of scalar product calculations
  • Familiarity with Newton's laws of motion
  • Basic concepts of force and displacement
NEXT STEPS
  • Study vector decomposition in physics
  • Learn about the implications of initial velocity on force and displacement
  • Explore the concept of work done by a force in different directions
  • Investigate additional forces and their effects on motion
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the complexities of force and displacement interactions.

SecretSnow
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Hi guys! I stumbled upon this truly weird question that seems counter intuitive to me. For the purpose of this question, I'll use x,y,z as unit vectors without the roof because I'm using my phone now..
If F= 160N x - 40N y and s= 14m x +11m y (as stated in the question) is this physically possible? I mean, the y-force is in the negative direction which I would take as downwards, and the displacement is actually positive, or upwards! Continuing this question, using scalar product method, I get 1800J as my answer. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are several ways this situation could come about. For example there could be other forces acting that you aren't told about, or the object being acted on by F could have some initial velocity and thus momentum in the y-direction. Unless you're specifically told that the object starts from rest, you can't make the assumption.
 
gneill said:
There are several ways this situation could come about. For example there could be other forces acting that you aren't told about, or the object being acted on by F could have some initial velocity and thus momentum in the y-direction. Unless you're specifically told that the object starts from rest, you can't make the assumption.

Yes, you're right. The question didn't specify that this is the only force. Thanks bro!
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
43
Views
5K