Work in Enthalpy: Clear Your Confusion

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ibraheem
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between work, enthalpy, and pressure in thermodynamic systems, particularly focusing on why work is considered canceled out in the change of enthalpy equation at constant pressure. Participants explore concepts related to gas expansion in a piston-cylinder apparatus and the implications of constant versus variable pressure on enthalpy and work calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question how the work done by a system can equal the work done on the system by atmospheric pressure, particularly in the context of a piston-cylinder apparatus.
  • There is a discussion about Newton's third law potentially explaining the relationship between the forces involved in the system.
  • One participant notes that the gas in the cylinder exerts a force on the surrounding air, which raises questions about the direction and nature of work done.
  • Another participant challenges the idea that work done by the gas is zero in the context of enthalpy, asking why the piston moves upward if both forces are at play.
  • Some participants express confusion about the conditions under which enthalpy equals heat (q) and what happens when pressure is not constant, leading to discussions about the implications for work done in different scenarios.
  • There are mentions of closed versus open systems and how this affects the understanding of work and enthalpy.
  • One participant clarifies that work is included in internal energy calculations but is treated differently in enthalpy calculations.
  • Concerns are raised about the applicability of certain equations to reversible versus irreversible processes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on several points, particularly regarding the treatment of work in the context of enthalpy and the implications of constant versus variable pressure. Multiple competing views remain on how these concepts interrelate.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding assumptions about system types (closed vs. open) and the conditions under which certain thermodynamic equations apply. The treatment of work in enthalpy calculations is also noted to depend on whether processes are reversible or irreversible.

Ibraheem
Messages
51
Reaction score
2
Hello,

I have been trying to understand why the work in the change of enthalpy equation is canceled out at constant pressure. How can work done by a system equal the work done on the system by atmospheric pressure. For example, when a reaction, taking place in piston-cylinder- like apparatus at standard conditions, releases gas, the piston moves up which means work done by the system.So how can the work done on the system by the atmospheric equals the pressure done by the gas from the reaction if we assume that the piston is mass-less.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Ibraheem said:
How can work done by a system equal the work done on the system by atmospheric pressure.
Newton's third law, maybe?

What other value of work would you expect?
 
Ibraheem said:
Hello,

I have been trying to understand why the work in the change of enthalpy equation is canceled out at constant pressure. How can work done by a system equal the work done on the system by atmospheric pressure. For example, when a reaction, taking place in piston-cylinder- like apparatus at standard conditions, releases gas, the piston moves up which means work done by the system.So how can the work done on the system by the atmospheric equals the pressure done by the gas from the reaction if we assume that the piston is mass-less.
The gas in the cylinder pushes the surrounding air outside the cylinder back by exerting a force on it through a distance.

Chet
 
If work done by atmospheric pressure equals the work done by the gas expansion then why the piston moves up ? In other words , if the pressure is applying a downward force on the piston and the expansion is applying an upward force and the piston moves upward(which I assume only expansion has done work), then why the work done by the gas in enthalpy is zero or why PV and W cancel out in the change of enthalpy equation?
 
Ibraheem said:
If work done by atmospheric pressure equals the work done by the gas expansion then why the piston moves up ? In other words , if the pressure is applying a downward force on the piston and the expansion is applying an upward force and the piston moves upward(which I assume only expansion has done work), then why the work done by the gas in enthalpy is zero or why PV and W cancel out in the change of enthalpy equation?
The gas does work on the piston in pushing it up against the atmosphere. So the work done by the gas on the piston is PΔV. If it's a closed system, then ΔU=Q-PΔV, where PΔV is the work. So, ΔU+PΔV=Q. But, expressed in terms of the enthalpy, ΔH=Q. So, if it's expressed in terms of the internal energy, the work is in there, but, if it's expressed in terms of the enthalpy, the work is not in there (or at least hidden). Both ways are equivalent.

Chet
 
So the system does work, but we ignore it by just calculating the heat.
 
Ibraheem said:
So the system does work, but we ignore it by just calculating the heat.
No. The work is included explicitly when we calculate ΔU. And, ΔH is merely defined as ΔU+Δ(PV), because it is sometimes handy to work with. So the work is always included.

Chet
 
Does this mean there will always be work done at constant pressure? So if I run a reaction in an open beaker there will always be work done.
 
Ibraheem said:
Does this mean there will always be work done at constant pressure? So if I run a reaction in an open beaker there will always be work done.
I'm not quite sure what you are getting at here. An open beaker is an open system, and, up to now we have been talking about closed systems (I think). Have all your questions been about applying the first law to open systems? Is that what you are learning about now? Also, running a reaction in an open beaker implies that you are dealing with a liquid. Is that the case? Is a gas given off by your reaction?

Chet
 
  • #10
The thing that is confusing me is why exactly enthalpy=q at only constant pressure? What if the pressure was not constant,what would happen?
 
  • #11
Ibraheem said:
The thing that is confusing me is why exactly enthalpy=q at only constant pressure? What if the pressure was not constant,what would happen?
This only happens in a situation where the gas expands by adding heat to the gas, while maintaining the external pressure of the surroundings (against which the gas does work) constant. Under these circumstances, the work done by the gas on the surroundings is w = PΔV, so that ΔU=q-PΔV. So, ΔH=q. Of course, this would also apply to removing heat from the gas, and letting it contract.

If the pressure is not constant, then the work is ##\int{PdV}##,

##ΔU=q-\int{PdV}##,

and ##ΔH=q+\int{VdP}##.

Also, I might add that all the equations I have written here apply exclusively to reversible processes. For irreversible processes, the situation is a little more complicated.

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibraheem

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K