Work on Block in Vertical Circle: MasteringPhysics

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a small block sliding in a vertical circle on a circular track, focusing on the forces acting on the block at different points in its path and the work done by friction during its motion from the bottom to the top of the circle.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between normal force, gravitational force, and velocity at the top and bottom of the circular path using equations of motion.
  • Some participants question the calculations of velocity and the application of energy conservation principles.
  • There is discussion about the correct approach to determine work done by friction, with suggestions to compare mechanical energy at points A and B.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, attempting to clarify calculations and explore different methods to find the work done by friction. Some guidance has been provided regarding the need to include potential energy in their calculations, but no consensus has been reached on the final answer.

Contextual Notes

Participants note confusion regarding the calculations and the need to correctly apply the principles of energy conservation and the forces acting on the block. There is an emphasis on ensuring all relevant forces and energies are accounted for in the analysis.

kottur
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A small block with mass 0.0325 kg slides in a vertical circle of radius 0.475 m on the inside of a circular track. During one of the revolutions of the block, when the block is at the bottom of its path, point A, the magnitude of the normal force exerted on the block by the track has magnitude 3.80 N. In this same revolution, when the block reaches the top of its path, point B, the magnitude of the normal force exerted on the block has magnitude 0.680 N.

How much work was done on the block by friction during the motion of the block from point A to point B?

Homework Equations



K1+U1+W=K2+U2

W=Fs

Conserved energy and motion in a circle

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that the distance from A to B is 2*r*pi=(19/20)*pi and I can use that as s in W=Fs. I don't know how to find out the friction.
All help would be very appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


kottur said:
I know that the distance from A to B is 2*r*pi=(19/20)*pi and I can use that as s in W=Fs. I don't know how to find out the friction.
That's the hard way. Try the easy way: Compare the mechanical energy at A and B.
 


kottur said:
Should I do it with change in velocity?
At the top: N+mg=m(v^2/r)=0.0325kg(v^2/0.475m)=0.680N so v=3.15 m/s.
At the bottom N-mg=m(v^2/r)=0.0325kg(v^2/0.457m)=3.80N so v=7.31 m/s.
I got it from here: http://dev.physicslab.org/Document.aspx?doctype=3&filename=OscillatoryMotion_VerticalCircles.xml

Is this in the right direction?
The equations N ± mg = mv^2/r are correct, but your calculations are not.

But that's the right idea to find the speed. (Even better is to find the KE, which is what you really want.)

Again, you'll eventually want to compare the total mechanical energy at A and B to see how much is lost.
 


Ok I tried finding KE with Wtot=K2-K1=0.5mv2^2-0.5mv1^2=0.5*0.0325kg*(7.31m/s)^2 - 0.5*0.0325kg*(3.15m/s)^2=0.7071J which is not correct...

I don't understand what's wrong with my calculations from above because I just plugged in the given variables to the formula.
 


kottur said:
I don't understand what's wrong with my calculations from above because I just plugged in the given variables to the formula.
What formula did you use?
 


Doc Al said:
The equations N ± mg = mv^2/r are correct, but your calculations are not.

You said that my calculations were wrong. I don't understand why because I just put the given variables into the equation N ± mg = mv^2/r.
 


kottur said:
You said that my calculations were wrong. I don't understand why because I just put the given variables into the equation N ± mg = mv^2/r.
Well, not exactly. Let's see what you actually did:
kottur said:
At the top: N+mg=m(v^2/r)=0.0325kg(v^2/0.475m)=0.680N so v=3.15 m/s.
The first part is correct: N+mg=m(v^2/r)=0.0325kg(v^2/0.475m)

But this does not equal 0.68 N.

You essentially used this formula: N = m(v^2/r), when you should have used: N+mg=m(v^2/r).

You left off the mg.
 


Okay thank you.

Now I got: N+mg=m(v^2/r)=0.0325kg(v^2/0.475m)+(9,8m/s^2)*0.0325kg =0.680N+0.3185N=0.9985N so v=3.82 m/s.

Then I got: Wtot=K2-K1=0.5mv2^2-0.5mv1^2=0.5*0.0325kg*(3.82m/s)^2 - 0.5*0.0325kg*(7.31m/s)^2= -0.631J which is still not correct.

Should I be using a different formula?
 
  • #10


kottur said:
Now I got: N+mg=m(v^2/r)=0.0325kg(v^2/0.475m)+(9,8m/s^2)*0.0325kg =0.680N+0.3185N=0.9985N so v=3.82 m/s.
This is good for point B. Now fix the other equation you used, for point A.
Then I got: Wtot=K2-K1=0.5mv2^2-0.5mv1^2=0.5*0.0325kg*(3.82m/s)^2 - 0.5*0.0325kg*(7.31m/s)^2= -0.631J which is still not correct.
Two problems:
- You're still using your incorrect value for the speed at point A.
- You're neglecting potential energy.
 
  • #11


0.0325kg(v^2/0.475m)=3.80-mg=3.4815N so v=7.13m/s.

Wtot=K2-K1=0.5mv2^2-0.5mv1^2=0.5*0.0325kg*(3.82m/s)^2 - 0.5*0.0325kg*(7.13m/s)^2= -0.589J

Is this enough for the correct answer? Do I still need to include the potential energy or have I done that already?

I'm sorry about being slow, I'm just so confused...
 
  • #12


kottur said:
0.0325kg(v^2/0.475m)=3.80-mg=3.4815N so v=7.13m/s.
Good.
Wtot=K2-K1=0.5mv2^2-0.5mv1^2=0.5*0.0325kg*(3.82m/s)^2 - 0.5*0.0325kg*(7.13m/s)^2= -0.589J

Is this enough for the correct answer? Do I still need to include the potential energy or have I done that already?
You still need to include gravitational potential energy. Call the potential energy at the bottom position = 0.

Use this formula, which you had in your first post: K1+U1+W=K2+U2
 
  • #13


K1+U1+W=K2+U2
K1+U1+W=K2+mgh
0.5*0.0325kg*(7.13m/s)^2+0+W=0.5*0,0325*(3.82m/s)^2+0.0325kg*9.8m/s^2*0.95m
so W= -0.286J

Thank you ever so much for the help. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K