Work out B0', E0', k' and omega', and show that the phase (kr-omega t) is

  • Thread starter Thread starter blueyellow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Omega Phase Work
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on analyzing an electromagnetic plane wave propagating in the x direction, with a focus on transforming the electric field E and magnetic field B under Lorentz transformations. The fields are defined as E(x, y, z, t) = E_{0}e^{i(k_{E} \cdot r - \omega_{E} t + \phi_{E})} and B(x, y, z, t) = B_{0}e^{i(k_{B} \cdot r - \omega_{B} t + \phi_{B})}. The transformation equations for E' and B' in a moving reference frame S' are derived, leading to the conclusion that the phase (kr - ωt) remains Lorentz invariant. The product of intensities E'_{0}B'_{0} is confirmed to be unchanged, demonstrating the consistency of electromagnetic wave behavior across different inertial frames.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic wave equations
  • Familiarity with Lorentz transformations
  • Knowledge of 4-vectors in physics
  • Basic concepts of wave polarization
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Lorentz transformations in detail
  • Learn about the properties of 4-vectors in special relativity
  • Explore the implications of wave polarization in electromagnetic theory
  • Investigate the relationship between electric and magnetic fields in moving frames
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism and special relativity, as well as educators seeking to clarify the concepts of wave behavior in different reference frames.

blueyellow

Homework Statement



An electromagnetic planewave with frequency ω is propagating in the x direction in a reference frame S; it is polarised in the y direction with amplitude E[itex]_{0}[/itex]. The k-[itex]\omega[/itex] 4-vector can be written (k[itex]_{x}[/itex], k[itex]_{y}[/itex], k[itex]_{z}[/itex], i[itex]\omega[/itex]/c).

a) Write down and define the fields of the plane wave E(x, y, z, t) and B(x, y, z, t), being sure to define all terms you use.
b) The plane wave is observed from a reference frame S' moving in the x direction with speed v relative to S. Work out B'[itex]_{0}[/itex], E'[itex]_{0}[/itex], k' and [itex]\omega[/itex]', and show that phase (kr - [itex]\omega[/itex]t) is Lorentz invariant.
c) Find the speed of the wave in S' and check that the product of the intensities E'[itex]_{0}[/itex]B'[itex]_{0}[/itex] is unchanged.

The Attempt at a Solution



a) E(x, y, z, t)=E[itex]_{0}[/itex]e[itex]^{i(k_{E}.r - \omega_{E}t+\phi_{E}}[/itex])
B(x, y, z, t)=B[itex]_{0}[/itex]e[itex]^{i(k_{B}.r - \omega_{B}t+\phi_{B}}[/itex])

But there seem to be so many equations for E and B around that I don't really know which one they are asking for in this case.

b) Does one have to use matrices? If so, what are the matrix representations of B and E? I lookled it up and couldn't find it anywhere. If not, how is the question meant to be done?

So

x'=[itex]\frac{x-vt}{(1-\frac{v^{2}}{c^{2}})^{1/2}}[/itex]
y'=y
z'=z
t'=[itex]\frac{t-v\frac{x^{2}}{c^{2}}}{(1-\frac{v^{2}}{c^{2}})^{1/2}}[/itex]

But I am not quite sure how that is supposed to help me to the question. Do I have to find the x, y, z and t components of the E and B fields? How is that meant to be done?

E[itex]_{x0}[/itex]=[itex]\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}[/itex][itex]\frac{qx_{0}}{(x^{2}_{0}+y^{2}_{0}+z^{2}_{0})^{3/2}}[/itex]

E[itex]_{y0}[/itex]=[itex]\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}[/itex][itex]\frac{qy_{0}}{(x^{2}_{0}+y^{2}_{0}+z^{2}_{0})^{3/2}}[/itex]

E[itex]_{z0}[/itex]=[itex]\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}[/itex][itex]\frac{qz_{0}}{(x^{2}_{0}+y^{2}_{0}+z^{2}_{0})^{3/2}}[/itex]

E'[itex]_{x0}[/itex]=[itex]\frac{\frac{qx}{4\pi\epsilon(x^{2}_{0}+y^{2}_{0}+z^{2}_{0})^{3/2}}-vt}{(1-\frac{v^{2}}{c^{2}})^{1/2}}[/itex]

E'[itex]_{y0}[/itex]=[itex]\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}[/itex][itex]\frac{qy_{0}}{(x^{2}_{0}+y^{2}_{0}+z^{2}_{0})^{3/2}}[/itex]

E'[itex]_{z0}[/itex]=[itex]\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}[/itex][itex]\frac{qz_{0}}{(x^{2}_{0}+y^{2}_{0}+z^{2}_{0})^{3/2}}[/itex]

Is this correct? What am I supposed to do about the B0', k' and omega'?

Please help.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
From some webpage on cramster.com that had a similar question:

E(x, y, z, t)=E[itex]_{0}[/itex]cos (kx-[itex]\omega[/itex]t)y-hat [equation 1]

E'[itex]_{x}[/itex]=E[itex]_{x}[/itex]=0
E'[itex]_{z}[/itex]=E[itex]_{z}[/itex]=0

E'[itex]_{y}[/itex]=[itex]\gamma[/itex](E[itex]_{y}[/itex] - vB[itex]_{z}[/itex])
E[itex]_{y}[/itex]=E[itex]_{0}[/itex]cos(kx-[itex]\omega[/itex]t)
B[itex]_{z}[/itex]=[itex]\frac{E_{0}}{c}[/itex]cos(kx-[itex]\omega[/itex]t)


E'[itex]_{y}[/itex]=[itex]\gamma[/itex](E[itex]_{0}[/itex]cos(kx-[itex]\omega[/itex]t)-[itex]\frac{E_{0}v}{c}[/itex]cos(kx-[itex]\omega[/itex]t)
E'=[itex]\gamma[/itex](E[itex]_{0}[/itex]cos(kx-[itex]\omega[/itex]t)-[itex]\frac{E_{0}v}{c}[/itex]cos(kx-[itex]\omega[/itex]t)

=[itex]\alpha[/itex]E[itex]_{0}[/itex]cos(kx-[itex]\omega[/itex]t)

where
[itex]\alpha[/itex]=[itex]\gamma[/itex](1-v/c)

so I figured that:

E'(x, y, z, t)=E'[itex]_{0}[/itex][cos (kx-[itex]\omega[/itex]t)]y-hat

E'[itex]_{0}[/itex]=[itex]\frac{E'}{[cos (kx-ωt)]y-hat}[/itex]

=[itex]\frac{\alpha E_{0}cos(kx-ωt)}{[cos (kx-ωt)]y-hat}[/itex]
=[itex]\frac{\alpha E_{0}}{y-hat}[/itex]

(substituting in [equation 1]):

=[itex]\alpha[/itex][itex]\frac{E(x, y, z, t)}{[cos (kx-ωt)](y-hat) (y-hat)}[/itex]

Stupid question, but what do I do with the y-hat y-hat on the denominator? I have never seen unit vectors in the denominator before. Do I just assume that the dot product is taken? If so, why? Or should the y-hats have not been there in the first place?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K