Work/spring: Work Done by Gravity & Spring Compression - 760 kg Elevator

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bones
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 4K views
Bones
Messages
108
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An elevator cable breaks when a 760 kg elevator is 29 m above the top of a huge spring (k = 8.00 × 104 N/m) at the bottom of the shaft.
(a) Calculate the work done by gravity on the elevator before it hits the spring.


(b) Calculate the speed of the elevator just before striking the spring.


(c) Calculate the amount the spring compresses (note that here work is done by both the spring and gravity).


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I got 215992 J for a, 23.8 m/s for b, and I need help with c. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bones said:

Homework Statement


An elevator cable breaks when a 760 kg elevator is 29 m above the top of a huge spring (k = 8.00 × 104 N/m) at the bottom of the shaft.
(a) Calculate the work done by gravity on the elevator before it hits the spring.

(b) Calculate the speed of the elevator just before striking the spring.

(c) Calculate the amount the spring compresses (note that here work is done by both the spring and gravity).

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


I got 215992 J for a, 23.8 m/s for b, and I need help with c. Thanks

OK. What is the formula for Work done by the spring?

It will involve a "distance", and the problem is telling you to include that additional potential energy in addition to the kinetic energy to determine the total depression.
 
I took -215992 J = .5(-8.0x10^4)(d^2) and got 2.32 m which is not correct according to webassign.
 
Bones said:
I took -215992 J = .5(-8.0x10^4)(d^2) and got 2.32 m which is not correct according to webassign.

Don't you also need the m*g*d term too?

I presume this is the correction you discovered?