Falling elevator onto a spring.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a 2000 kg elevator cab that falls onto a spring after its cable snaps. The cab is initially at rest 2.8 m above the spring, which has a spring constant of 0.30 MN/m. The discussion centers around calculating the speed of the cab just before impact, the maximum compression of the spring, and the subsequent motion of the cab after compression, while considering the effects of gravity and friction.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the work done by gravity and friction and the potential energy stored in the spring. There are attempts to derive equations for the maximum compression of the spring and the work done during the elevator's fall.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the equations governing the problem, with participants questioning the assumptions about distances and forces involved. Some guidance has been provided regarding the work-energy principle, but confusion remains regarding the correct application of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the distance the elevator falls may exceed the initial 2.8 m, and there is uncertainty about how to incorporate the work done by friction and gravity during the spring's compression into their calculations.

  • #31
J-dizzal said:
(17200N)x=1/2 300000N/m
x=8.721m not sure what I am doing wrong.
The units are not even right again.

J-dizzal said:
edit. i can't put an x2 on the right side because then i cannot solve for x
First, yes you could still solve for x
Second, you can't just leave out an important part of an equation because it makes it harder to solve!
We are making no progress. Let us start from square one...
Please explain to me your approach to this problem. How are you going to find where the velocity is zero?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
if the energy of the elevator hits the spring with 48160J how far does the spring compress? 17200x =48160?
 
  • #33
Nathanael said:
The units are not even right again.First, yes you could still solve for x
Second, you can't just leave out an important part of an equation because it makes it harder to solve!
We are making no progress. Let us start from square one...
Please explain to me your approach to this problem. How are you going to find where the velocity is zero?
velocity =0 when the spring distance is maximum, or when the work done by the spring = 48160 +17200x where x is the distance of spring compression.
 
  • #34
J-dizzal said:
velocity =0 ... when the work done by the spring = 48160 +17200x where x is the distance of spring compression.
Yes, exactly. Now what is the work done by the spring?
 
  • #35
Nathanael said:
Yes, exactly. Now what is the work done by the spring?
48160J +17200x = Wspring
 
  • #36
J-dizzal said:
48160J +17200x = Wspring
Yes but do you know an expression for the work done by a spring being compressed?
 
  • #37
Nathanael said:
Yes but do you know an expression for the work done by a spring being compressed?
.5kx2
but when i put them together i get .3211 = x(x-17200) can't go any further.
 
  • #38
J-dizzal said:
.5kx2
but when i put them together i get .3211 = x(x-17200) can't go any further.
Well yes, it's a quadratic equation. You need to use the quadratic formula.
(The trick to solving these equations is called "completing the square," but if you "complete the square" for the general expression ax2+bx+c=0 then you will arrive at the quadratic equation, so you can just use that.)
 
  • #39
My homework is past due (midnight). i really need to understand this though.
 
  • #40
Nathanael said:
Well yes, it's a quadratic equation. You need to use the quadratic formula.
(The trick to solving these equations is called "completing the square," but if you "complete the square" for the general expression ax2+bx+c=0 then you will arrive at the quadratic equation, so you can just use that.)
im getting -8534 and -8665.6 using the quardratic eq. i forgot completing the squares
 
  • #41
J-dizzal said:
im getting -8534 and -8665.6 using the quardratic eq. i forgot completing the squares
Double check yourself, I get 0.6269m
 
  • #42
J-dizzal said:
My homework is past due (midnight). i really need to understand this though.
The work done by the spring is equal to the work done by gravity minus work done by friction. This comes from the work-energy theorem which says the change in kinetic energy (in this case zero) is equal to the net work done.

The work done by the spring is 0.5kx2
The work done by gravity is mgD (where D is the distance fallen)
The work done by friction is FfD (where D is the distance fallen)

So the equation is 0.5kx2=(mg-Ff)D

The important thing to realize is that D=(2.8+x)

Your mistake was to say D=2.8
 
  • #43
Nathanael said:
The work done by the spring is equal to the work done by gravity minus work done by friction. This comes from the work-energy theorem which says the change in kinetic energy (in this case zero) is equal to the net work done.

The work done by the spring is 0.5kx2
The work done by gravity is mgD (where D is the distance fallen)
The work done by friction is FfD (where D is the distance fallen)

So the equation is 0.5kx2=(mg-Ff)D

The important thing to realize is that D=(2.8+x)

Your mistake was to say D=2.8

Ok thanks, yea I am having trouble tonight.
my eq is 0=x2 -17200x - 0.3211 does this look right? i keep getting huge values for x.
 
  • #44
J-dizzal said:
Ok thanks, yea I am having trouble tonight.
my eq is 0=x2 -17200x - 0.3211 does this look right? i keep getting huge values for x.
It should be 0=150,000x2-17,200x-48,160

I assume you got your equation by dividing by 150,000? But you forgot to divide the 17200 by 150000.
 
  • #45
Nathanael said:
It should be 0=150,000x2-17,200x-48,160

I assume you got your equation by dividing by 150,000? But you forgot to divide the 17200 by 150000.
ok i see now. I am so out of it i can't even do algebra lol. so then part c would be 48160-17200(.6269) J is the energy of the spring pushing and then subtract 48160+friction?

edit. maybe Fs would be a better equation to start with.
 
  • #46
J-dizzal said:
48160-17200(.6269) J is the energy of the spring pushing
It should be a plus sign not a minus. Or you could use 150000(0.6269)^2

For this part you are going to have a change in spring energy, a change in gravitational energy, and the total change in energy will be the work done by friction. The kinetic energy will be zero again.

Maybe you should get some sleep before doing this part :smile:

Think about part D as well, that part is more interesting. It will be more satisfying to figure it out yourself so give it some time before asking questions.
 
  • #47
Nathanael said:
It should be a plus sign not a minus. Or you could use 150000(0.6269)^2

For this part you are going to have a change in spring energy, a change in gravitational energy, and the total change in energy will be the work done by friction. The kinetic energy will be zero again.

Maybe you should get some sleep before doing this part :smile:

Think about part D as well, that part is more interesting. It will be more satisfying to figure it out yourself so give it some time before asking questions.
Ok thanks for all the help again Nathanael. I'll have a new series of problems tomorrow but hopefully will have time to get back at this problem.
 
  • #48
J-dizzal said:
Ok thanks for all the help again Nathanael. I'll have a new series of problems tomorrow but hopefully will have time to get back at this problem.
Hopefully Nathanael will be well rested to prepare for this. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nathanael and J-dizzal

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
14K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K
Replies
26
Views
6K