Wormhole Trouble: Spacetime Folding Over Itself

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Charlie G
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wormhole
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of wormholes and the representation of spacetime folding over itself. Participants express discomfort with visualizations of wormholes and explore how these ideas are conceptualized in physics, touching on the nature of spacetime and dimensionality.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the idea of spacetime folding over itself, expressing discomfort with the visual representations of wormholes.
  • Another participant suggests that the "fold" in diagrams is not a physical representation but rather a convenient way to illustrate complex concepts that cannot be accurately depicted.
  • A participant challenges the notion of viewing spacetime as flat, asking how a wormhole can connect different areas if it is perceived as flat.
  • Responses indicate that the space surrounding the U-shaped diagram does not exist, implying that the universe itself is not embedded in higher-dimensional space.
  • One participant reflects on their disappointment with a show that focused on wormholes rather than black holes, indicating a desire for more information on black hole phenomena like event horizons and escape velocity.
  • A later reply discusses the use of analogies in diagrams, explaining that the folding is an attempt to project higher-dimensional curvature into lower dimensions, while noting that extra dimensions are not necessary for mathematical descriptions of curvature.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion contains multiple competing views regarding the representation of spacetime and wormholes, with no consensus reached on the best way to conceptualize these ideas.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the limitations of visual representations and analogies in conveying complex concepts, noting that these may not accurately reflect the underlying physics or mathematics.

Charlie G
Messages
115
Reaction score
0
I was watching the Universe and it was talking about the wormhole concept. I was uncomfortable with the images of a wormhole because the spacetime folded over itself, and I was wondering how we got the idea that spacetime folds over itself? I never really imagined spacetime to do that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Charlie G said:
I was watching the Universe and it was talking about the wormhole concept. I was uncomfortable with the images of a wormhole because the spacetime folded over itself, and I was wondering how we got the idea that spacetime folds over itself? I never really imagined spacetime to do that.

Hi Charlie G! :smile:

If you mean the diagram like a U on its side, with a little tube connecting the top and bottom,

then that "fold" isn't physical … it's just a convenient way of trying to draw something that can't be drawn …

you should regard the curvy bit as if it was flat. :wink:
 
Thx for the reply. If I look at it as flat though then how does the wormhole connect to another area?
 
Charlie G said:
Thx for the reply. If I look at it as flat though then how does the wormhole connect to another area?

'cos it just does! :biggrin:

(the space in the picture, round the U, doesn't exist … the U is our universe, and it isn't "embedded" in some higher-dimensional space)
 
Charlie G said:
Thx for the reply. If I look at it as flat though then how does the wormhole connect to another area?
tiny-tim said:
'cos it just does! :biggrin:
(the space in the picture, round the U, doesn't exist … the U is our universe, and it isn't "embedded" in some higher-dimensional space)

.. or use a U shaped worm hole :-/
 
Thx for the help. I bought the episode cosmic holes on my xbox hoping to learn about balck hole stuff like event horizons and escape velocity, but all the show talked about was wormholes, I was pretty dissapointed in it.
 
Remember all diagrams and pictures are analogies. Some of the "folding over" is an attempt to project an analogy of the curved 3-dimensional subspace of a curved 4-dimensional space-time into the flat 2-d screen of a diagram.

Also we tend to think in terms of flat space and so more easily see curvature as occurring inside higher dimensions. For example We in 3-dim looking at the 2-dim curved surface of a sphere from afar find it much easier to conceptualize rather than imagining how walking in a "straight line" on the surface will lead us back where we started or triangles interior angles won't add up to 180deg.

But the extra dimensions is not necessary to describe the curvature mathematically nor is it conceptually necessary for the physics. It is just helpful since the mathematics is not simple nor easy to integrate into our intuition. Also diving ito the mathematical description would be unhelpful in programs on television aimed at the interested non-experts.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K