Wormholes: Are they practical?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Friendlyel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Practical Wormholes
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the practicality of wormholes as a means of transportation and their theoretical underpinnings. Participants explore concepts related to traversable wormholes, the requirements for their stability, and the implications of using them for travel, including potential physical effects on travelers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the likelihood of using wormholes for transportation, citing concerns about the massive forces involved potentially destroying anything that passes through.
  • There is discussion about the theoretical study of traversable wormholes, which would allow for return trips without experiencing harmful tidal forces or time dilation.
  • It is noted that a stable traversable wormhole would require "exotic" matter, which is theorized to have negative density, although there is disagreement on the feasibility and quantity of such matter.
  • One participant humorously reflects on the implications of time travel related to aging, indicating a misunderstanding in their earlier post about the effects of wormholes on age.
  • Another participant mentions the concept of relativistic travel and its effects on aging, suggesting that wormholes could theoretically allow for different aging experiences compared to traditional travel.
  • There is a reference to the challenges in defining the spacetime structure necessary for wormholes, with concerns about the physical validity of the required energy distributions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the practicality and theoretical aspects of wormholes, with no consensus reached on their feasibility or the nature of exotic matter required for their existence.

Contextual Notes

Discussions include unresolved questions about the existence of negative mass and the implications of metric mechanics in describing wormholes. The conversation reflects ongoing research and uncertainty in the field.

Friendlyel
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I was just wondering since I discussed this with some people before, but exactly how likely is it that wormholes in space-time are possible to use for transportation methods or some other form of practical use? One thing I heard as a most likely problem with it is the fact that the massive force involved in them would most likely destroy anything that would go through it - is there any possible theorem that could lead to some sort of process to keep it from feeling the weight on it as it goes through?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Over the last twenty years there has been a lot of theoretical study of traversable wormholes, i.e., wormholes through which a person can make a return trip without experiencing body-altering tidal and g-forces, and without experiencing time dilation (you don't to return and find that you're older than your children).

A stable traversable wormhole requires "exotic" matter to hold it open, and exotic matter is such that some observers measure its density to be negative.

There are some hints from quantum theory that exotic matter is theoretically possible, but not everyone agrees on how much is needed, how much is posibble, etc.

Your question lies in an area of active research.
 
George Jones said:
Over the last twenty years there has been a lot of theoretical study of traversable wormholes, i.e., wormholes through which a person can make a return trip without experiencing body-altering tidal and g-forces, and without experiencing time dilation (you don't to return and find that you're older than your children).

Oddly, enough, even though I haven't gone through a wormhole, I'm already older than my children!
 
HallsofIvy said:
Oddly, enough, even though I haven't gone through a wormhole, I'm already older than my children!

Readinmg this actually made me laugh out loud!

For the sake of other people reading this thread, In my first post I meant to write:

you don't want to return and find that you're younger than your children
 
Just to pick on it further ;-) Any relativistic travel (sans wormhole) should suffice to return younger than your children, the wormhole trick is returning older than your parents!
 
I remember hearing about requiring exotic mass to create one. Is there any such element or substance with negative mass known to people right now?
 
The problem with workholes is that they are generally found by metric mechanics - you specify the spacetime structure you want and then invert to find the required energy distribution - generally finding it to be "weird" and hence you are unsure if it's a physically valid description.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K