Would a Alcubierre drive produce a gravity wave wake?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter newjerseyrunner
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drive Gravity Wave
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Alcubierre drive and its potential effects on gravity waves as it moves through spacetime. Participants explore theoretical implications, mathematical aspects, and the nature of gravitational waves in relation to this hypothetical faster-than-light travel mechanism.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that if negative energy density is achievable, the Alcubierre drive could have observable effects on spacetime.
  • Others argue that the Alcubierre drive is purely a science fiction concept, questioning its validity in real physics.
  • A participant requests a mathematical focus on Alcubierre's solutions to Einstein's equations, distancing the discussion from fictional representations.
  • One participant notes that while the Alcubierre drive is a legitimate question in general relativity, they express uncertainty about whether it would produce gravitational waves in isolation.
  • Another participant draws parallels to the Michelson-Morley experiment, suggesting that if the Earth doesn't create a gravitational wave wake, the Alcubierre drive might not either, though they acknowledge the differences in context.
  • Some participants assert that all massive objects, including the Earth, produce gravitational waves, albeit at unmeasurable amplitudes, while others challenge this by stating that isolated objects do not produce gravitational waves.
  • There is speculation that the extreme warping of spacetime around the Alcubierre drive could lead to side effects, including gravitational waves, during the departure and arrival processes.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential interactions with matter during the journey, suggesting that the presence of particles could complicate the theoretical framework.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the Alcubierre drive and its implications for gravitational waves. There is no consensus on whether the drive would produce a gravitational wave wake, and multiple competing perspectives remain throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in current understanding, including the dependence on the feasibility of negative energy and the unresolved nature of gravitational wave production in various scenarios.

newjerseyrunner
Messages
1,532
Reaction score
637
Discussion of gravity waves got me thinking about objects that seriously distort spacetime and I started wondering about the Alcubierre drive idea. Let's make the assumption that negative energy density is in fact possible and another species has figured out how to do it. What outside-observable effects would it produce as it moved?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
None. It is a Sci-fy FTL travel device that functions perfectly in Star Trek.
 
How is that possible? Could you explain where all of that energy goes, or does the expansion and contraction on either side completely cancel out?

Also, please leave Star Trek out of this, I don't want talk about fictional drives, I'm not even really interested in the drive itself, I'm asking about Alcubierre's solutions to Einstein's equations, which is not sci-fi, but valid physics. Please keep this purely mathematical.
 
The Wiki page on the Alcubierre drive delves into the physics and mathematics far better than I can. Someone took the time to create a Wiki page, have you looked that over. Not that Wiki is an authoritive source, but it is a start.
 
Alclubierre 'warp drive' is one of a whole class of similar solutions in GR where entering and leaving a 'warp bubble' you can travel FTL relative to paths through nearby approximately flat spacetime not going through the bubble (or tube, or presumably other topologies). As is the case in SR/GR, if FTL is allowed, time travel is allowed - by combining two warp drives you can created a closed timelike curve and travel to your own past. There is nothing controversial about any of this in GR except whether it has any relation to our universe. These solutions entail large amounts of negative energy, manipulated in specific ways; there is no evidence this possibility is possible in principle in our universe.

Thus, the OP is a completely legitimate GR physics (or mathematical physics if you believe the negative energy requirements rule it out of being physics) question. Unfortunately, I have no idea of the answer or else I would have responded earlier. I made a couple of brief searches to see if this question had been investigated, but found nothing. A heuristic guess is that it would not produce GW in isolation, but as it is used by some rocket to travel from one star to another, there would be a small amount of GW emitted by the departure process and the arrival process. Do not attach much weight to this guess.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42 and berkeman
I don't know, but consider this reasoning: Michelson and Morley failed to detect any "ether drag." This didn't make sense to them until Einstein proposed that the speed of light is constant for all inertial reference frames. We believe that g-waves travel at c also. Given that the Earth doesn't experience a drag, I assume the ship wouldn't create a wake behind it either. But the Earth isn't traveling FTL inside a space-time bubble, so maybe that changes things
 
The Earth does produce a wake, all objects with mass do, that's why orbiting objects create waves. The Earth is simply tiny and slow moving, so it's gravity wake is unmeasurable. The amplitude of the gravity wave of the Earth-Sun orbit would be 1 part in 10^25.

Of course the ship itself would produce a gravity wake (assuming it's got mass) but I'm more interesting in side effects from the extreme warping of space in front and behind the bubble.
 
newjerseyrunner said:
The Earth does produce a wake, all objects with mass do, that's why orbiting objects create waves. The Earth is simply tiny and slow moving, so it's gravity wake is unmeasurable. The amplitude of the gravity wave of the Earth-Sun orbit would be 1 part in 10^25.

Of course the ship itself would produce a gravity wake (assuming it's got mass) but I'm more interesting in side effects from the extreme warping of space in front and behind the bubble.
No, the Earth does NOT produce a wake. The co-orbiting system produces GW that do not originate from either the Earth or the sun, and the distantly observed point of origination would not be to exactly the Earth or the sun. If the Earth were isolated in the universe, it would produce no GW. You can even have an accelerating rocket and produce exactly no GW if the thrust is such as not to produce change in quadropole moment of the system. The Kinnersley photon rocket is an exact solution of an accelerating rocket that produces no GW because the anisotropy is exclusively dipolar.

See: http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9412063

So my guess, without finding any references on this, or doing any computations, remains that a warp buble with contained rocket operating in an empty universe (or far enough away from everything else) produces no GW.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: newjerseyrunner
Ontophobe said:
I don't know, but consider this reasoning: Michelson and Morley failed to detect any "ether drag." This didn't make sense to them until Einstein proposed that the speed of light is constant for all inertial reference frames. We believe that g-waves travel at c also. Given that the Earth doesn't experience a drag, I assume the ship wouldn't create a wake behind it either. But the Earth isn't traveling FTL inside a space-time bubble, so maybe that changes things
The Earth does feel a slight drag from the emission of GW by the earth/sun system. All orbits of massive bodies in GR are, in principle, unstable due to GW.
 
  • #10
At least for the start and destination, I would be very surprised if you could generate volumes with the necessary spacetime warping without inducing any side-effects.
No idea about the theoretical journey in between. An experimental realization (if possible at all) won't be perfect, so I would expect gravitational waves there as well.
 
  • #11
mfb said:
At least for the start and destination, I would be very surprised if you could generate volumes with the necessary spacetime warping without inducing any side-effects.
No idea about the theoretical journey in between. An experimental realization (if possible at all) won't be perfect, so I would expect gravitational waves there as well.
And what happens to all the stuff during the journey? There is no real vacuum so all the protons and what else is there might cause major trouble.
 
  • #12
Show me an Alcubierre drive with all the details worked out so it is possible to build one and I'll tell you.
 
  • #13
PAllen said:
The Earth does feel a slight drag from the emission of GW by the earth/sun system. All orbits of massive bodies in GR are, in principle, unstable due to GW.
Interesting. Thanks! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K