Would a reverse wing sweep be better for speeds above Mach 2

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of reverse wing sweep in aircraft design, particularly its potential advantages and challenges at speeds exceeding Mach 2. Participants explore various aspects including stability, maneuverability, and historical examples such as the Grumman X-29.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express curiosity about reverse wing sweep for enhancing turning capabilities at high speeds.
  • Concerns are raised regarding the trade-offs of forward swept wings, particularly related to reduced yaw stability and its implications for stealth and maneuverability.
  • There is a discussion about the balance between stability and maneuverability in modern fighters, with some arguing that instability can enhance maneuverability, while others caution against excessive yaw instability.
  • The Grumman X-29 is mentioned as a historical example that tested the concept of reverse wing sweep.
  • Participants note that the X-29 required computer control to manage its flight characteristics, raising questions about the performance of similar designs, such as a German prototype that never flew.
  • Concerns are highlighted regarding the potential for instability and flutter in reverse wing sweep designs, specifically mentioning "aeroelastic divergent twisting" as a significant issue.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the benefits and drawbacks of reverse wing sweep, with multiple competing views on stability, maneuverability, and historical examples remaining unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on specific design parameters and the unresolved nature of the performance implications of reverse wing sweep in high-speed flight.

Joseph Wood
I am curious about a reverse wing sweep because it could be used on an aircraft for turning at high speeds at higher than Mach two.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
There are a lot of trade-offs with a forward swept wing. One that comes to mind in modern fighters is that the yaw stability is reduced. If stealth is desired, the vertical tail is minimized and there is already a danger of yaw instability. But that is just one of many considerations.
 
FactChecker said:
One that comes to mind in modern fighters is that the yaw stability is reduced.

I thought stability is the last thing you want in a modern fighter? I mean - aren't they designed to be unstable, as it allows fast maneuvering?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
Borek said:
I thought stability is the last thing you want in a modern fighter? I mean - aren't they designed to be unstable, as it allows fast maneuvering?
You are right that you don't want too much stability because the plane will be slow to react. But that is mostly in the roll and pitch axes that are critical for maneuvering. I don't think that there is any benefit to having a low yaw stability margin (this is pushing the limits of my knowledge of the subject). Of course the plane must not be so unstable in any axis that the flight controls can not handle it. The Air Force will specify that the plane must have a certain minimal closed loop stability phase and gain margins. The margin allows for some safety, even with deterioration in the plane and controls, future modifications, and new weapons loaded.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
Earlier concept.
f55be65ba547d5b1ba16cb173427847b.jpg
 
Noisy Rhysling said:
Earlier concept.

Considering that Grumman need a computer to control the X-29 I wonder what the results of the test flight of the German prototype were.
 
  • #10
gleem said:
Considering that Grumman need a computer to control the X-29 I wonder what the results of the test flight of the German prototype were.
Never flew.
 
  • #11
A big problem with reverse wing sweep is that it is liable to cause nasty instability and flutter problems (described as "aeroelastic divergent twisting" in the Wikipedia article on the X-29) when the wing flexes. A small amount of flexing obviously tends to twist the end in a direction which will tend to amplify the effect. For the X-29 they did some clever engineering tricks to overcome that such that bending the wing one way caused the end to twist in the opposite direction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K