Joseph Wood
I am curious about a reverse wing sweep because it could be used on an aircraft for turning at high speeds at higher than Mach two.
The discussion revolves around the concept of reverse wing sweep in aircraft design, particularly its potential advantages and challenges at speeds exceeding Mach 2. Participants explore various aspects including stability, maneuverability, and historical examples such as the Grumman X-29.
Participants do not reach a consensus on the benefits and drawbacks of reverse wing sweep, with multiple competing views on stability, maneuverability, and historical examples remaining unresolved.
Limitations include the dependence on specific design parameters and the unresolved nature of the performance implications of reverse wing sweep in high-speed flight.
FactChecker said:One that comes to mind in modern fighters is that the yaw stability is reduced.
You are right that you don't want too much stability because the plane will be slow to react. But that is mostly in the roll and pitch axes that are critical for maneuvering. I don't think that there is any benefit to having a low yaw stability margin (this is pushing the limits of my knowledge of the subject). Of course the plane must not be so unstable in any axis that the flight controls can not handle it. The Air Force will specify that the plane must have a certain minimal closed loop stability phase and gain margins. The margin allows for some safety, even with deterioration in the plane and controls, future modifications, and new weapons loaded.Borek said:I thought stability is the last thing you want in a modern fighter? I mean - aren't they designed to be unstable, as it allows fast maneuvering?
Just the bird I was thinking of.gleem said:Grumman X-29 tested this concept
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grumman_X-29
Noisy Rhysling said:Earlier concept.
Never flew.gleem said:Considering that Grumman need a computer to control the X-29 I wonder what the results of the test flight of the German prototype were.