I Would these (unrealistic) conditions imply gravitons existed?

  • Thread starter NotASmurf
  • Start date
So quantum states collapse when observed, ie they are interacted with, if one had an uncharged massive particle, in a true vaccuum (yes, this assumption is egregious, not your usual "ignore air resistance"), and the state of the aforementioned particle collapsed, would that imply gravitons did exist, because there would be no other particle to interact with it?


Gold Member
Jumping into the deep end ...

Particles can be kept in a state of superposition in the midst of all our gravity. So if you are correct in your hypothesis then I think the same reasoning (inverted) might apply to say that gravitons do not exist.

Or that the presence of gravity does not disturb superposition.
quantum states collapse when observed, ie they are interacted with
Only on a collapse interpretation of QM. There are also no collapse interpretations, such as the MWI. "Collapse" is not something that is directly observed, so I don't think your question is well defined.
You're 100% right, terribly phrased question on my part, I butchered physics like how engineers ruin math

Want to reply to this thread?

"Would these (unrealistic) conditions imply gravitons existed?" You must log in or register to reply here.

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving

Hot Threads