Write the system in equation form?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathrocks
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Form System
Click For Summary
To express the given 3x3 matrix in equation form, the system of differential equations can be derived using the variables x(t), y(t), and z(t). The equations are x'(t) = 3x(t) - 2y(t) + z(t), y'(t) = -x(t) + 3y(t) - 2z(t), and z'(t) = -y(t) + 3z(t). This notation clearly shows the relationships and rates of change of each variable over time. The confusion may arise from using "x(t)" to denote both the vector function and its components. The final equations effectively represent the dynamics of the system.
mathrocks
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm given a matrix and I need to write it in equation form so that I will have three equations, using x(t), y(t), and z(t)

The matrix is a 3x3
[3 -2 0]
x'= [-1 3 -2] *x
[0 -1 3]

I know how to rewrite it using only x(t) but I'm not sure how to do it using y(t) and z(t).

thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your problem may be that you are using " x(t)" in two different ways- as a vector function and as a component of the vector. Your
[3 -2 1]
[-1 3 2] x
[0 -1 3]

is the same as

[3 -2 1][x(t)]
[-1 3 2][y(t)]
[0 -1 3][z(t)]

Do the matrix multiplication: that's
[3x(t)- 2y(t)+ z(t)]
[-x(t)+ 3y(t)+2z(t)]
[0x(t)- y(t)+3z(t)]

so your system of differential equations is x'(t)= 3x(t)- 2y(t)+ z(t),
y'(t)= -x(t)+ 3y(t)+ 2z(t), and z'(t) -y(t)+ 3z(t).
 


To write the system in equation form, we can use the notation x'(t) to represent the derivative of x with respect to time. Using this notation, we can rewrite the given matrix equation as follows:

x'(t) = 3x(t) - 2y(t)
y'(t) = -x(t) + 3y(t) - 2z(t)
z'(t) = -y(t) + 3z(t)

These three equations represent the system in equation form, where x(t), y(t), and z(t) are the variables and their derivatives represent the rate of change of each variable with respect to time. This notation allows us to easily see the relationships between the variables and how they change over time.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K