Writing a squared observable in Dirac notation

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on expressing the expectation value of a squared observable in Dirac notation. The expectation value is correctly represented as <A^2> = <Ψ|Ĥ^2|Ψ>, where Ĥ is the operator in question. Participants clarify that this is distinct from the square of the expectation value, <A>^2. The importance of Hermitian operators in this context is emphasized, as they allow for certain properties in the calculations. Overall, the conversation aids in understanding the proper notation and relationships between operators and their expectation values.
Zero1010
Messages
40
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
I need help writing in Dirac notation
Relevant Equations
##<A>=\int_{-\infty}^\infty \Psi^*(x) \hat A \Psi (x) dx ##
##<A> = <\Psi|\hat A|\Psi>##
##<A^2>=\int_{-\infty}^\infty |\Psi^*(x)|^2 \hat A^2 dx ##
Edited after post below:

Hi,

I need to show that the square of the expectation value of an observable takes a certain form in Dirac notation.

I know in wave notation that the expectation value is a sandwich integral which looks like this:

##<A>=\int_{-\infty}^\infty \Psi^*(x) \hat A \Psi (x) dx ##

Which is written in Dirac notation as:

##<A> = <\Psi|\hat A|\Psi>##

And the expectation value of a squared observable is written as:

##<A^2>=\int_{-\infty}^\infty \Psi^*(x) \hat A^2 \Psi(x) dx ##

But I am not sure how to write this in Dirac notation.

Thanks for any help and hopefully this makes sense.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Zero1010 said:
And the expectation value of a squared observable is written as:

##<A^2>=\int_{-\infty}^\infty |\Psi^*(x)|^2 \hat A^2 dx ##

This can't be right. You have a number on the LHS and an operator on the RHS. It should be:

##<A^2>=\int_{-\infty}^\infty \Psi^*(x) \hat A^2 \Psi (x) dx ##

Note also that this is the expectation value of the square of the observable/operator and not to be confused with ##\langle A \rangle^2##, which is the square of the expectation value.
 
Thanks for the heads up.

I was looking at the expectation value from my textbook (see image) which is obviously different. Thanks
 

Attachments

  • 1579716468197.png
    1579716468197.png
    7.4 KB · Views: 252
Zero1010 said:
Thanks for the heads up.

I was looking at the expectation value from my textbook (see image) which is obviously different. Thanks

If you have the position operator, or the position operator squared, then we have:

##\Psi^*(x) \hat x^2 \Psi(x) = \Psi^*(x) x^2 \Psi(x) = |\Psi(x)|^2x^2##

But, this does not hold for a general operator ##\hat A##. For example, if we have the differential operator:

##\Psi^*(x) \hat D \Psi(x) = \Psi^*(x) \frac{d\Psi}{dx}(x) \ne |\Psi(x)|^2 \frac{d}{dx}##
 
  • Like
Likes DEvens
Ok that makes sense.

The operator I am dealing with is Hermitian which is important later in the question I'm working on.
 
So in Dirac notation is it just written as:

##<\Psi(x)|\hat A^2|\Psi(x)>##
 
  • Like
Likes DEvens
Zero1010 said:
So in Dirac notation is it just written as:

##<\Psi(x)|\hat A^2|\Psi(x)>##

Yes, that's the expectation value for the operator ##\hat A^2##. Look at it this way: you could write ##\hat B = \hat A^2##, then:

##\langle A^2 \rangle = \langle B \rangle = \langle \Psi | \hat B |\Psi \rangle = \langle \Psi | \hat A^2 |\Psi \rangle ##
 
Ok. Thanks for your help so far its been great.

One last thing, does this make sense (hopefully):

##<A^2>=<\psi|\hat A^2|\Psi>##

##<A^2>=<\psi|\hat A \hat A|\Psi>##

The operate on the right acts on Psi so:

##<A^2>=<\psi|\hat A|\hat A\Psi>##

Since ##\hat A## is Hermitian (therefore - ##<f|\hat A g> = <\hat A f| g>##):

##<A^2>=<\hat A \psi|\hat A\Psi>##
 
Zero1010 said:
Ok. Thanks for your help so far its been great.

One last thing, does this make sense (hopefully):

##<A^2>=<\psi|\hat A^2|\Psi>##

##<A^2>=<\psi|\hat A \hat A|\Psi>##

The operate on the right acts on Psi so:

##<A^2>=<\psi|\hat A|\hat A\Psi>##

Since ##\hat A## is Hermitian (therefore - ##<f|\hat A g> = <\hat A f| g>##):

##<A^2>=<\hat A \psi|\hat A\Psi>##

Yes. In general:

##\langle \Psi|\hat A \hat B|\Psi \rangle = \langle (\hat A^{\dagger} \Psi)|(\hat B\Psi) \rangle##
 
  • Like
Likes DEvens
  • #10
Cool.

Thanks again for your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K