Writing Co-efficients Elegantly w/ Real Numbers

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter SeReNiTy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the representation of coefficients defined by a recursive relationship involving real numbers. Participants explore various notations and definitions for these coefficients, including factorial and product notations, and the implications of using the gamma function as an extension of the factorial function to real numbers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a definition for coefficients using factorial notation, questioning the validity of using factorials for real numbers.
  • Another participant suggests that the expression "z!/(z-n)!" makes sense, drawing an analogy to natural numbers.
  • A different approach is introduced using the product notation, defined recursively, with a focus on the notation's representation as a capital pi.
  • Some participants clarify that the capital pi symbol represents the product operation, while others mention the historical context of learning this notation.
  • One participant introduces the gamma function as an extension of the factorial function to real numbers, suggesting it as a valid alternative for defining coefficients.
  • Another participant challenges the uniqueness of the gamma function's extension, providing examples of other functions that agree with the factorial on natural numbers but differ elsewhere.
  • Further clarification is provided regarding the properties of the gamma function and its differentiability, although some participants express limited knowledge on the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity and uniqueness of the gamma function as an extension of the factorial function, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to define coefficients for real numbers.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about the applicability of factorials and the gamma function to real numbers, as well as the definitions and properties of these mathematical concepts.

SeReNiTy
Messages
170
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, just wondering if you can give me some advice on how to write certain co-efficients with in a compact elegant way.

The co-efficients are given by the following rule:

a0=1
a1=z
a2=z(z-1)
a3=z(z-1)(z-2)
.
.
.
an=z(z-1)(z-2)...(z-(n-1))

where a = any real number

I was thinking of using the following definition, an = z!/(z-n)! which seems to give me the correct results but I am worried about whether or not the ! can be defined on real numbers. Like is there a problem with this definition?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The ! can't really be defined on reals analogously to on N, but the expression "z!/(z-n)!" as a whole makes a lot of sense. Analogously to N, it means multiply z by z-1 by z-2, etc up to z-n+1.
 
How about (for n>1)

[tex]a_n = \prod_{i=0}^{n-1} (z-i)[/tex]

Written differently, you can define it recursively by

[tex]a_0 = 1[/tex]

and

[tex]a_n = a_{n-1} \cdot (z - (n-1)), \ \text{for } \, n \geq 1[/tex]
 
Last edited:
morphism said:
How about (for n>1)

[tex]a_n = \prod_{i=0}^{n-1} (z-i)[/tex]

Written differently, you can define it recursively by

[tex]a_0 = 1[/tex]

and

[tex]a_n = a_{n-1} \cdot (z - (n-1)), \ \text{for } \, n \geq 1[/tex]


What's that thing called anyway? I know that it is to multiplication what the sigma is to addition, but is it just a capital pi or what?
 
Pythagorean said:
What's that thing called anyway? I know that it is to multiplication what the sigma is to addition, but is it just a capital pi or what?

I am pretty sure it is just a capital pi.
 
I learned it as "product". But that was fifty years ago...
 
Lol maybe you misunderstood, yes they mean it as product as well jim, but they're just saying, the actual letter used to show that is a capital pi from the greek alphabet.

And just incase everyones forgotten, these can be very easily written with binomial notation?

EDIT: Shoot my last statement, though it could still help a tiny bit.

[tex]{r \choose k} &{}= {1 \over k!}\prod_{n=0}^{k-1}(r-n)=\frac{r(r-1)(r-2)\cdots(r-(k-1))}{k!}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Try [tex]\frac{\Gamma(z+1)}{\Gamma(z-n+1)}[/tex]
The gamma function is the unique extension of the factorial function to the real numbers. [tex]\Gamma(z+1) = z![/tex]

By the way, if you are only doing this with integers, the accepted notation is [tex](z)_n[/tex] It is known as the falling factorial, or Pochhammer symbol
 
Last edited:
LukeD said:
The gamma function is the unique extension of the factorial function to the real numbers.
It's not unique. For example,

[tex]f(z) = \Gamma(z + 1) + \sin (\pi z)[/tex]

also agrees with the factorial function on the natural numbers. And so does

[tex]f(z) = \begin{cases}<br /> 0 & z < 0\\<br /> \lfloor z \rfloor ! & z \geq 0[/tex]

and

[tex]f(z) = \begin{cases}<br /> z! & z \in \mathbb{N} \\<br /> -14 & z \notin \mathbb{N}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Hurkyl said:
It's not unique. For example,

[tex]f(z) = \Gamma(z + 1) + \sin (\pi z)[/tex]

also agrees with the factorial function on the natural numbers. And so does

[tex]f(z) = \begin{cases}<br /> 0 & z < 0\\<br /> \lfloor z \rfloor ! & z \geq 0[/tex]

and

[tex]f(z) = \begin{cases}<br /> z! & z \in \mathbb{N} \\<br /> -14 & z \notin \mathbb{N}[/tex]
What I meant is that it's unique in that it extends all of the properties of the factorial function to the real (and complex) numbers so that for all complex numbers (except 0) [tex]\Gamma(z+1) = z*\Gamma(z)[/tex] and so that it is complex differentiable at all points except 0,-1,-2,...

However, I haven't studied the Gamma function, so I don't know much else about it.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K