MHB Writing equation from a description

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joystar77
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Writing
AI Thread Summary
The equation derived from the description is 2(x + y * 3 + 5 * z) = 10, indicating that "by" implies multiplication for the following terms. The discussion emphasizes the importance of interpreting the wording correctly, particularly distinguishing between "by" and "times." Participants agree that the order of operations (PEMDAS) should be applied, as there are no clear groupings provided. Simplifying the equation leads to moving constant terms to one side, but further simplification is limited without additional information. The consensus is that the initial interpretation of the equation is the most accurate.
Joystar77
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
The result of multiplying 2 by x plus y times 3 plus 5 times z is equal to 10.

2x + y * 3 + 5 * z = 10

2x + 3y + 5z = 10

or

2 (x + y * 3 + 5 * z) = 10

2x + 2y + 6 + 10 + 2z = 10

2x + 2y + 16 + 2z = 10

Can someone please check this for me and tell me which way is right? I forgot how to do these type of problems.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Correct way of doing Algebra Problem

Given the way this is stated I think we can reason that "by" means to multiply everything that follows by 2, since for the other terms multiplication is written as "times". There should be a reason that they used a different word for multiplication.

For the rest of the equation we have to assume that nothing is grouped in a certain way outside of the order of operations (PEMDAS) since we have such little information.

So I agree with this interpretation you wrote:

2 (x + y * 3 + 5 * z) = 10

You can simplify that some by getting all terms without a variable to the right side but other than that you can't do anything else.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top