MHB Writing equation from a description

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joystar77
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Writing
Joystar77
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
The result of multiplying 2 by x plus y times 3 plus 5 times z is equal to 10.

2x + y * 3 + 5 * z = 10

2x + 3y + 5z = 10

or

2 (x + y * 3 + 5 * z) = 10

2x + 2y + 6 + 10 + 2z = 10

2x + 2y + 16 + 2z = 10

Can someone please check this for me and tell me which way is right? I forgot how to do these type of problems.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Correct way of doing Algebra Problem

Given the way this is stated I think we can reason that "by" means to multiply everything that follows by 2, since for the other terms multiplication is written as "times". There should be a reason that they used a different word for multiplication.

For the rest of the equation we have to assume that nothing is grouped in a certain way outside of the order of operations (PEMDAS) since we have such little information.

So I agree with this interpretation you wrote:

2 (x + y * 3 + 5 * z) = 10

You can simplify that some by getting all terms without a variable to the right side but other than that you can't do anything else.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top