X is an accumulation point show there is subsequence that converges to x

  • Thread starter Thread starter jrsweet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Point Subsequence
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that if x is an accumulation point of the sequence {a_n}, then there exists a subsequence {a_{n_k}} that converges to x. Participants highlight that every neighborhood around x, defined as (x-e, x+e), contains infinitely many points of the sequence. The construction of the subsequence involves ensuring that for each k, the terms satisfy the condition x - 1/k < a_{n_k} < x + 1/k, thereby demonstrating convergence to x as k approaches infinity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of accumulation points in real analysis
  • Familiarity with subsequences and convergence
  • Knowledge of neighborhoods in metric spaces
  • Basic concepts of limits and epsilon-delta definitions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definition and properties of accumulation points in real analysis
  • Learn about constructing subsequences from sequences
  • Explore the epsilon-delta definition of limits in calculus
  • Investigate the concept of neighborhoods in metric spaces
USEFUL FOR

Students of real analysis, mathematicians interested in sequence convergence, and educators teaching concepts of limits and accumulation points.

jrsweet
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose x is an accumulation point of {an: n is a member of integers}. Show there is a subsequence of (an) that converges to x.

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm a little stuck on this one. I know that since x is an accumulation point then every neighborhood around x, (x-e,x+e) contains infinitely many points of an. I guess I just don't know how to construct the subsequence.

Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose the subsequence we want is [tex]a_{n_1}, a_{n_2}, \ldots[/tex] with [tex]n_1 < n_2 < \cdots[/tex]. If you could ensure that [tex]x-1/k < a_{n_k} < x+1/k[/tex] for all k you'd be done (why?). Can you think of how you can ensure such a sequence exists?
 
Can we say the sequence is {x-1/k2} for integers>0 ? I'm still a little confused.

I know that the interval (x-1/k, x+1/k) will be contained in a neighborhood of x, and thus has infinitely many points. I'm not sure why we are using 1/k though. I guess we are in essence using the definition of an accumulation point repeatedly and narrowing the interval and making it converge to x?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K