XOR or OR: Examining Everyday Logic

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jk22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logic
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the distinction between the logical operators "or" and "xor" in everyday language. Participants argue that while "or" can imply exclusivity (as in mutually exclusive options), it often functions as an inclusive operator in common usage. Examples provided include phrases like "you can have meat or fish for dinner," which typically do not imply exclusivity. The conversation highlights the context-dependent nature of language, suggesting that "or" can represent both logical interpretations depending on the situation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of logical operators, specifically "or" and "xor".
  • Familiarity with everyday language usage and its nuances.
  • Basic knowledge of context-dependent semantics.
  • Awareness of philosophical implications in language interpretation.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between logical "or" and "xor" in formal logic.
  • Explore context-dependent semantics in linguistics.
  • Study philosophical perspectives on language and meaning.
  • Listen to NPR's "A Way with Words" for further insights on language usage.
USEFUL FOR

Philosophers, linguists, educators, and anyone interested in the intricacies of language and logic will benefit from this discussion.

jk22
Messages
732
Reaction score
25
In logic a or b is true if both a and b are true but do you think the everyday or is in fact xor ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In logic, a or b is true, if at least one among a and b is true.
The everyday or can mean either xor or the logical or, sometimes one and sometimes the other. The meaning is usually obvious from the context.
 
xor is usually NOT the everyday meaning of or.
 
mathman said:
xor is usually NOT the everyday meaning of or.
I disagree:
  • you can have meat or fish for dinner
  • I won't be back until Tuesday or Wednesday
  • my bet for the winners of the World Cup is Germany or England
  • are you going to vote for the liberal candidate or the conservative?
  • this problem should take five or ten minutes
I can think of some everyday "inclusive or"s though:
  • I am waiting for a number 14 or a number 52 bus
  • the committee is quorate if there are three members present including the Chairman or Treasurer
Bored with this now...
 
MrAnchovy said:
I disagree:
  • you can have meat or fish for dinner
  • I won't be back until Tuesday or Wednesday
  • my bet for the winners of the World Cup is Germany or England
  • are you going to vote for the liberal candidate or the conservative?
  • this problem should take five or ten minutes
I can think of some everyday "inclusive or"s though:
  • I am waiting for a number 14 or a number 52 bus
  • the committee is quorate if there are three members present including the Chairman or Treasurer
Bored with this now...
All of your examples are for things that are mutually exclusive. In those situations xor and or are identical.
 
mathman said:
All of your examples are for things that are mutually exclusive. In those situations xor and or are identical.
True for most of the first list, but (i) that merely illustrates the point that very often "or" in everyday speech is exclusive; and (ii) it is certainly possible to have both meat and fish for dinner, but this would not normally be the way "you can have meat or fish for dinner" is interpreted.
 
How about this sound bite:

A: Is it 3:00pm or 4:00pm?
B: Yes.

This is an xor response and is almost never used (except by math types making jokes) in normal English speech. Most educated people impliclty get it, but think the responder is being difficult or pedantic, almost never funny. My personal experience only.
 
jim mcnamara said:
How about this sound bite:

A: Is it 3:00pm or 4:00pm?
B: Yes.

This is an xor response and is almost never used (except by math types making jokes) in normal English speech. Most educated people impliclty get it, but think the responder is being difficult or pedantic, almost never funny. My personal experience only.

I don't understand what you mean by this. Are you contrasting xor with or? If yes, the answer "yes" doesn't depend on our interpretation of "or" here. The nature of time dictates that or and xor are equivalent in this example.
By now, MrAnchovy's examples should've cleared everything up, I think.
 
I think this is more of a philosophy or sociology question, not a Mathematics or Logic question ( in neither sense of the word 'or' ;) )
 
  • #10
In common usage 'or' can correspond with the logical or, but sometimes with the logical 'xor'.
The latter usage is not uncommon.
For example 'Do you prefer oranges or apples?'
 
  • #11
It's context dependent. If the context implies "either.. or" then it is xor. If the context implies "if a or if b", then it is not exclusive. language is not consistently logical. There can be many exceptions, and it can depend on regional influences.

Correction: "either.. or" is not always xor. It is xor only if "but not both" is implied. But I guess that makes my point.

Added: If you like this subject, you should listen to NPR "A Way with Words". You might send them this question.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TheDemx27

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
846
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K