Yang-Mills Stress-Energy Tensor Explained

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Yang-Mills stress-energy tensor, specifically the notation and interpretation of the trace in its expression. Participants explore the implications of this notation in the context of gauge theories and the mathematical structures involved.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks clarification on the meaning of the trace in the expression for the stress-energy tensor, suggesting a conventional interpretation of the trace as a sum over diagonal elements.
  • Another participant notes that the trace is taken over group indices that are not explicitly written, indicating a specific context for the notation.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that using the trace notation can be problematic in the context of Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD), proposing that it would be clearer to represent the field tensor with an adjoint representation index instead.
  • Further elaboration is provided on the matrix-valued field tensor and its relation to the Lie algebra of the group, including details about the trace properties and gauge invariance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriateness of the trace notation and its implications in the context of gauge theories. No consensus is reached regarding the best approach to represent the stress-energy tensor or the clarity of the notation used.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight potential limitations in the notation, particularly regarding the clarity of the trace in relation to QCD and the representation of the field tensor. The discussion reflects a range of assumptions about the mathematical structures involved.

ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
1,387
It's given as ##T_{\mu \nu} = - \mathrm{tr}(F_{\mu \lambda} {F_{\nu}}^{\lambda} - \frac{1}{4} g_{\mu \nu} F_{\alpha \beta} F^{\alpha \beta})##. Can somebody explain the notation, i.e. what is the meaning here of the trace? (usually I would interpret the trace of a matrix as the number ##\mathrm{tr}(a_{\mu \nu}) = {a^{\mu}}_{\mu}##.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Physics news on Phys.org
The trace is over the group indices that are not explicitly written out.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: ergospherical
It would have made more sense to just show "a" as a SU(n) adjoint rep. index on those F's, rather than use Tr which becomes problematic when you consider QCD, that is adding gammas and spinors and their trace(s).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and ergospherical
ergospherical said:
It's given as ##T_{\mu \nu} = - \mathrm{tr}(F_{\mu \lambda} {F_{\nu}}^{\lambda} - \frac{1}{4} g_{\mu \nu} F_{\alpha \beta} F^{\alpha \beta})##. Can somebody explain the notation, i.e. what is the meaning here of the trace?

For such questions of notation, it would be helpful to give the reference.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and ergospherical
ergospherical said:
It's given as ##T_{\mu \nu} = - \mathrm{tr}(F_{\mu \lambda} {F_{\nu}}^{\lambda} - \frac{1}{4} g_{\mu \nu} F_{\alpha \beta} F^{\alpha \beta})##. Can somebody explain the notation, i.e. what is the meaning here of the trace?
Here F_{\mu\nu} is the matrix-valued field tensor: F_{\mu\nu} = \mathcal{F}_{\mu\nu}^{a}X_{a} , where the X’s are a set (in fact, any set) of matrices satisfying the Lie algebra of the group [X_{a},X_{b}] = i C_{ab}{}^{c}X_{c}.
So \mbox{Tr}\left( F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}\right) = \mathcal{F}_{\mu\nu}^{a}\mathcal{F}^{\mu\nu b} \ \mbox{Tr} \left( X_{a}X_{b}\right), and \mbox{Tr}\left(X_{a}X_{b}\right) \equiv \left(X_{a} X_{b}\right)_{ii}, \ \ i = 1,2, \cdots , p where p is the dimension of the representation. For simple compact Lie groups, we can always choose the X’s to be trace-orthonormal \mbox{Tr}\left( X_{a}X_{b}\right) = 2C \delta_{ab} , where C is a constant for each irreducible part of the representation. The matrix notation is useful because it makes gauge-invariance (kind of) obvious: \mbox{Tr}\left(gF_{\mu\nu}g^{-1}gF^{\mu\nu}g^{-1}\right) = \mbox{Tr}\left( F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}\right).
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: ergospherical, vanhees71 and dextercioby

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K