Yang-Mills Stress-Energy Tensor Explained

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Yang-Mills stress-energy tensor is defined as T_{\mu \nu} = - \mathrm{tr}(F_{\mu \lambda} {F_{\nu}}^{\lambda} - \frac{1}{4} g_{\mu \nu} F_{\alpha \beta} F^{\alpha \beta}). The trace operation in this context is taken over the group indices not explicitly shown, which can complicate interpretations, especially in Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) when incorporating gamma matrices and spinors. The field tensor F_{\mu\nu} is expressed as F_{\mu\nu} = \mathcal{F}_{\mu\nu}^{a}X_{a}, where X_{a} are matrices that satisfy the Lie algebra of the group. The trace properties of these matrices are crucial for maintaining gauge invariance in the formulation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Yang-Mills theory
  • Familiarity with matrix notation and trace operations
  • Knowledge of Lie algebras and their representations
  • Basic concepts of Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of the Yang-Mills stress-energy tensor
  • Explore the properties of trace in matrix algebra, specifically in the context of Lie groups
  • Investigate gauge invariance in Yang-Mills theories
  • Learn about the role of gamma matrices and spinors in QCD
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, particularly those specializing in gauge theories, quantum field theory, and particle physics, as well as graduate students seeking to deepen their understanding of Yang-Mills theory and its applications.

ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
1,387
It's given as ##T_{\mu \nu} = - \mathrm{tr}(F_{\mu \lambda} {F_{\nu}}^{\lambda} - \frac{1}{4} g_{\mu \nu} F_{\alpha \beta} F^{\alpha \beta})##. Can somebody explain the notation, i.e. what is the meaning here of the trace? (usually I would interpret the trace of a matrix as the number ##\mathrm{tr}(a_{\mu \nu}) = {a^{\mu}}_{\mu}##.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Physics news on Phys.org
The trace is over the group indices that are not explicitly written out.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: ergospherical
It would have made more sense to just show "a" as a SU(n) adjoint rep. index on those F's, rather than use Tr which becomes problematic when you consider QCD, that is adding gammas and spinors and their trace(s).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and ergospherical
ergospherical said:
It's given as ##T_{\mu \nu} = - \mathrm{tr}(F_{\mu \lambda} {F_{\nu}}^{\lambda} - \frac{1}{4} g_{\mu \nu} F_{\alpha \beta} F^{\alpha \beta})##. Can somebody explain the notation, i.e. what is the meaning here of the trace?

For such questions of notation, it would be helpful to give the reference.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and ergospherical
ergospherical said:
It's given as ##T_{\mu \nu} = - \mathrm{tr}(F_{\mu \lambda} {F_{\nu}}^{\lambda} - \frac{1}{4} g_{\mu \nu} F_{\alpha \beta} F^{\alpha \beta})##. Can somebody explain the notation, i.e. what is the meaning here of the trace?
Here F_{\mu\nu} is the matrix-valued field tensor: F_{\mu\nu} = \mathcal{F}_{\mu\nu}^{a}X_{a} , where the X’s are a set (in fact, any set) of matrices satisfying the Lie algebra of the group [X_{a},X_{b}] = i C_{ab}{}^{c}X_{c}.
So \mbox{Tr}\left( F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}\right) = \mathcal{F}_{\mu\nu}^{a}\mathcal{F}^{\mu\nu b} \ \mbox{Tr} \left( X_{a}X_{b}\right), and \mbox{Tr}\left(X_{a}X_{b}\right) \equiv \left(X_{a} X_{b}\right)_{ii}, \ \ i = 1,2, \cdots , p where p is the dimension of the representation. For simple compact Lie groups, we can always choose the X’s to be trace-orthonormal \mbox{Tr}\left( X_{a}X_{b}\right) = 2C \delta_{ab} , where C is a constant for each irreducible part of the representation. The matrix notation is useful because it makes gauge-invariance (kind of) obvious: \mbox{Tr}\left(gF_{\mu\nu}g^{-1}gF^{\mu\nu}g^{-1}\right) = \mbox{Tr}\left( F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}\right).
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: ergospherical, vanhees71 and dextercioby

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
811
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K