MHB Yes, that makes sense! Thank you for explaining it to me.

bugatti79
Messages
786
Reaction score
4
Hi Folks,

It is been given that differentiation of \phi(x,y)=0 is \phi_{x} dx+ \phi_{y} dy=0 however I arrive at

\phi_{x} dx/dy+ \phi_{y} dy/dx=0 via the chain rule. Where \phi_{x}=d \phi/dx etc

What am I doing wrong?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are you differentiating $\phi$ with respect to? Your equation
$$\phi_x \, \frac{dx}{dy}+\phi_y \, \frac{dy}{dx}=0$$
looks schizophrenic - as if you're simultaneously trying to differentiate w.r.t. $x$ and $y$.
 
Ackbach said:
What are you differentiating $\phi$ with respect to? Your equation
$$\phi_x \, \frac{dx}{dy}+\phi_y \, \frac{dy}{dx}=0$$
looks schizophrenic - as if you're simultaneously trying to differentiate w.r.t. $x$ and $y$.

Hi, I am referring to eqn 3.2.9 in attached
 

Attachments

  • Implicit 1.jpg
    Implicit 1.jpg
    26.2 KB · Views: 98
I would say that $\phi_x \, dx+\phi_y \, dy=0$ is really taking the differential of both sides. If you wanted to differentiate w.r.t. $x$, then you would get
$$\phi_x+\phi_y \, \frac{dy}{dx}=0,$$
and if w.r.t. $y$, you'd get
$$\phi_x \, \frac{dx}{dy}+\phi_y=0.$$

Does that answer your question?
 
Ackbach said:
I would say that $\phi_x \, dx+\phi_y \, dy=0$ is really taking the differential of both sides. If you wanted to differentiate w.r.t. $x$, then you would get
$$\phi_x+\phi_y \, \frac{dy}{dx}=0,$$
and if w.r.t. $y$, you'd get
$$\phi_x \, \frac{dx}{dy}+\phi_y=0.$$

Does that answer your question?

I think the last 2 equations are coming from the chain rule so yes I can see that.

However, not sure how one arrives at the first equation 3.2.9 by differentiating "both sides"?

Thanks
 
bugatti79 said:
I think the last 2 equations are coming from the chain rule so yes I can see that.

However, not sure how one arrives at the first equation 3.2.9 by differentiating "both sides"?

Thanks

It was slightly sloppy wording, in my view. They're really "taking the differential" of both sides. Imagine that $y=f(x)$. If you "took the differential" of both sides, you'd get $dy=f'(x) \, dx$, right? This is not, strictly speaking, differentiation. It's taking the differential. If you were to differentiate, you'd get $y'=f'(x)$.

So, taking the differential of $\phi(x,y)=0$ amounts to doing $\phi_x \, dx+ \phi_y \, dy=0$ in a similar fashion. Does that make sense?
 
  • Like
Likes bugatti79
Back
Top