Yet another Flow rate question

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding fluid flow through a long pipeline, specifically a 60-mile long pipeline with a diameter of 13 feet that is gravity-fed and experiences elevation changes. Participants explore the applicability of Bernoulli's equation, pressure changes, and fluid velocity in relation to these factors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks to understand if Bernoulli's equation is applicable in this scenario, given the observed pressure changes along the pipeline due to elevation and friction.
  • Another participant questions whether the flow is compressible or incompressible, with a subsequent response confirming it is incompressible.
  • It is suggested that Bernoulli's equation can be applied if friction losses are accounted for, and that pressure changes will occur with elevation changes.
  • A participant asserts that fluid velocity will not change unless there is a change in pipe diameter, attributing elevation changes to potential energy changes rather than velocity changes.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of the pipe, with one participant noting it might be more appropriate to refer to it as a tunnel and confirming it is completely filled during operation.
  • Another participant mentions that Bernoulli's equation should be applied between two points, using the overall elevation difference for calculations.
  • Reference is made to the Darcy-Weisbach equation for calculating pressure drop in incompressible flow, emphasizing that Bernoulli's equation only accounts for pressure changes due to head and velocity.
  • It is noted that the Darcy equation can also be used for compressible fluids under certain conditions, but still requires Bernoulli's equation for elevation, velocity, and density changes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the application of Bernoulli's equation and the relationship between pressure changes and fluid velocity. There is no consensus on the interpretation of these concepts, and multiple competing views remain present.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need to account for friction losses and the specific conditions under which different equations apply, indicating potential limitations in the assumptions made about the flow and pressure calculations.

MEdesigner
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am trying to better understand conceptually flow through a long pipeline. in this case the pipeline is 60miles long with a diameter of 13feet. the outlet is located lower than the inlet by about 600 feet and the pipe has several elevation increases and decreases over the length of the run. The entire system is gravity fed.

I have seen measured pressure data over the length of the pipeline and observed rises and falls in the pressure which appear dependent on elevation gain, or pressure drop due to friction. The pipe maintains a constant diameter over it's entire length.

Does Bernoulli's equation hold true for this case? What I am really trying to understand is whether or not there are fluid velocity changes associated with the observed pressure changes.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Is it compressible or incompressible flow?
 
incompressible
 
Sorry, I just saw in your post that it is gravity feed.

You can apply Bernoulli's equation so long as you allow for friction losses.

You will indeed see pressure changes at various points throughout where the elevation changes (and pipe diameter if it were to).
 
MEdesigner said:
What I am really trying to understand is whether or not there are fluid velocity changes associated with the observed pressure changes.

It's safe to assume that the velocity won't change unless the diameter of the pipe changes at some point.

The elevation changes will result in a potential energy change (hydrostatic head change), but is not attributed to a velocity change.
 
13'? Yowza. That's a big pipe. Are you certain that the pipe is completely filled during its operation? It most likely is but it's something to ask.
 
it is more appropriate to call it a tunnel, rather than a pipe, and yes it is completely filled during use. My fluids experience is primarily with external flows so this type of internal flow problem is interesting and just outside of my comfort zone.
 
Bernoulli would have to be applied between two points, so if you're looking for data at the outlet, you will have to use that 600' difference as your overall delta z. You might be able to approximate the changes in elevation as minor losses in an elbow (assuming the changes in elevation are elbow-like).
 
For incompressible flow, Crane recommends the use of the Darcey Weisbach equation for pressure drop. This equation provides the frictional pressure loss. Bernoulli's equation accounts for changes in pressure due to head and velocity only. Pick up a copy of the Crane paper here:
http://www.flowoffluids.com/
 
  • #10
Crane TP410 also states that you can use the Darcy equation with reasonable accuracy for compressilbe fluids (such as air and steam) so long as the pressure drop isn't greater than 10% of the inlet pressure and the specific volume is based on either upstream or downstream conditions.

In either case you also need to use the Bernoulli equation to account for the elevation, velocity, and density changes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
651
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K