Young's Double Slit Experiment questions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conditions necessary for Young's Double Slit Experiment to produce observable interference patterns. The consensus is that the two beams must have equal intensity (option b) to ensure proper interference, while options a, c, and d are deemed false. It is clarified that coherence is crucial, and only a single coherent light source, such as a laser, should be used to maintain a constant phase difference. The coherence length of the laser is also highlighted as a critical factor in achieving the desired interference effects.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Young's Double Slit Experiment
  • Knowledge of coherence and coherence length in optics
  • Familiarity with laser physics and light sources
  • Basic principles of wave interference
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of coherence length in lasers
  • Study the mathematical principles behind wave interference
  • Explore the differences between coherent and incoherent light sources
  • Learn about phase locking techniques in laser technology
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, optical engineers, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of wave interference and the principles behind Young's Double Slit Experiment.

opticaltempest
Messages
135
Reaction score
0
I am stuck on a question regarding Young's Double Slit Experiment.

The two beams in Young's double slit experiment must

(a) be parallel
(b) have equal intensity
(c) come from the same source
(d) traverse equal distancesHere are my reasons for my answers. I may be misinterpreting certain parts to this question. Please help correct me on any misunderstandings. There is only one correct answer.

(a) FALSE - I can eliminate this answer because even if the two beams were shined slightly angled into the slits, only the parallel component of the beam would pass through the slit. We would just end up with less light entering the slit if the entering beams were not parallel.

(b) TRUE - I guess this answer is assuming that we are using two different sources of light. If we use two different sources and they are not the same intensity then the interference patterns might not appear correctly.

(c) FALSE - We could use two separate lasers. The light emitted from both lasers will be coherent. Even though the lasers may not have the same phase shift, we will still get an interference pattern as long as they have the same intensity.

(d) FALSE - The point of this experiment is to cause light to travel different distances which ends up causing a relative phase shift. This produces the cancellation of the light and creates the interference pattern.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
opticaltempest said:
(a) FALSE - I can eliminate this answer because even if the two beams were shined slightly angled into the slits, only the parallel component of the beam would pass through the slit. We would just end up with less light entering the slit if the entering beams were not parallel.
So that's the equivalent of saying that only the parallel part is used. ie you are actually using parallel beams.


(b) TRUE - I guess this answer is assuming that we are using two different sources of light. If we use two different sources and they are not the same intensity then the interference patterns might not appear correctly.
You will still get an inteference pattern but it won't go down to zero, no perfectly black lines. This is called the visibility, the ratio (vmax-vmin)/(vmax+vmin)

(c) FALSE - We could use two separate lasers. The light emitted from both lasers will be coherent. Even though the lasers may not have the same phase shift, we will still get an interference pattern as long as they have the same intensity.
No (assuming you don't have a complex phase locked laser pair) only indivual photons have constant phase, two photons from the same laser aren'tcoherent never mind photons from separate lasers.

(d) FALSE - The point of this experiment is to cause light t
o travel different distances which ends up causing a relative phase shift. This produces the cancellation of the light and creates the interference pattern.
To produce an interference effect the beams must be a whole number of wavelengths different. In practice they must be within the coherence length of the laser - this is the distance over which the light from the laser keeps phase. It depends on the wavelength/bandwidth and the type of laser .
Thanks[/QUOTE]
 
Thanks for all the help! I think I see that my main problem is that I don't quite understand coherence. Only a single photon has the property of coherence? My textbook says:

"A laser differs from common light sources in that its atoms emit light in a cooperative manner, thereby making the light coherent."

I also defines coherence as

"If two light waves that meet at a point are to interfere perceptibly, the phase difference between them must remain constant with time; that is, the waves must be coherent. When the two coherent waves meet, the resulting intensity may be found by using phasors."

After reading these descriptions of coherence, I don't understand why two separate lasers cannot be used to carry out the experiment. Is there a web page with more explanations? But, in order for this experiment to work, we MUST use a SINGLE source of coherent light. Correct?
 
Actually I should have said a single wave packet.
A laser emits photons that are coherent over a certain period of time or length, this is the coherence length. Photons emitted within this time, or this distance apart are coherent.

You don't have any control on what phase these coherent photons are, they are random, just all random with the same value! So you can't have a second laser with the same phase as the first.
Actually a way of making extremely stable lasers is to have two lasers pointing at each other, photons from one will trigger emission in the other with the same phase so the lasers phaselock each other - but really this is just a single light source, it just has two laser cavities.
 
Thanks again for the help mgb_phys
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K