Young's Slits and "one-at-a-time" photons

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter tim1608
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photons
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the behavior of photons emitted "one-at-a-time" in the Young's Slits experiment. A proposed solution suggests that the probability distribution of a photon is not as thin as initially assumed, allowing for interference patterns across the entire screen. The thickness of this distribution is linked to the coherence time of the light source, which varies significantly depending on the source, ranging from approximately 200 femtoseconds for sunlight to milliseconds for high-quality lasers. This understanding clarifies how interference can occur even when photons are emitted individually.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly photon behavior.
  • Familiarity with the Young's Slits experiment and its implications for wave-particle duality.
  • Knowledge of coherence time and its relevance in quantum optics.
  • Basic concepts of probability distributions in quantum physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of coherence time in quantum optics and its impact on photon behavior.
  • Explore the Young's Slits experiment in detail, focusing on interference patterns and their significance.
  • Study the properties of different light sources, including their coherence times and emission characteristics.
  • Investigate the mathematical modeling of probability distributions in quantum mechanics.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers interested in the behavior of photons and interference phenomena in optics.

tim1608
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
Hi Everyone

There is a problem that I have with understanding what happens when photons are emitted "one-at-a-time" in the Young's Slits experiment. However, I think I may have come up with a solution to this problem and would be very grateful for your thoughts.

Let's say a single photon is emitted from a photon emitter and let's assume that absolutely no electrical or magnetic disturbances whatsoever are emitted from the emitter before or after the emission of the photon until the next photon is emitted after a period of time which allows the current photon to reach the screen. As I see it, the photon's probability distribution which will emerge from the aperture of the emitter (assuming the photon has not already been absorbed by the physical structure of the emitter itself) will have the shape of a thin spherical shell fragment with perhaps some diffractive fringing around the edge of the fragment. This probability distribution moves forward until it meets the filter containing the Young's Slits. At this point, the photon may get absorbed by the filter itself but let's assume that this does not happen and the probability distribution continues on through the slits. If we imagine that there is an imaginary vertical plane which is perpendicular to the filter and is exactly half way between the two slits and we assume that the emitter is positioned exactly on this plane then this means that the probability distribution will pass through both slits at exactly the same time. The slits will convert the probability distribution into two probability sub-distributions. As I see it, as these two thin, shell-like sub-distributions move forwards towards the screen, they can only intersect and therefore interfere with each other at points which are on the imaginary vertical plane I mentioned earlier which is exactly half way between the two slits. This means that interference can only happen along a single line down the middle of the screen, not the whole screen.

I have managed to think of a solution to the above problem which allows a proper interference pattern to emerge on the whole screen. The solution is that the shell of the probability distribution is not as thin as I have been assuming. If it is as thick as the distance between the slits or thicker then I can see that this will enable a proper interference pattern to emerge. I would be very grateful for the thoughts of the experts on this forum about my solution.

Thank you very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tim1608 said:
I have managed to think of a solution to the above problem which allows a proper interference pattern to emerge on the whole screen. The solution is that the shell of the probability distribution is not as thin as I have been assuming. If it is as thick as the distance between the slits or thicker then I can see that this will enable a proper interference pattern to emerge. I would be very grateful for the thoughts of the experts on this forum about my solution.

Good question. Indeed, this "shell" is not as thin as one might think. The "thickness" is given by the coherence time of the source. It might sound strange, but photon emission is not taking place at a well fixed moment in time. There is some uncertainty to it. For example, if you consider a photon placed inside a resonator with good mirrors, it will go back and forth several times and you will typically not be able to tell whether it left the resonator after a few round trips more or less. For emission from an atom, you will get a superposition between the excited state and the ground state and the probability density to find an electron in one of this states will oscillate back and forth several times. So will the probability density to find a photon in the field.

Accordingly, the uncertainty in photon emission roughly corresponds to how long this superposition is kept alive. If the photon could now take two possible paths to one spot on the screen and both are with a distance given by the speed of light times the duration of the superposition, interference is possible and it is impossible to find out in principle when exactly the photon was emitted.

The exact timescale of the coherence time depends on your light source. It is around 200 fs for our sun and can go up to milliseconds for good lasers. Accordingly, the "thickness" of that "shell" can be anything from micrometers to kilometers depending on your light source.
 
Hi Cthugha

Thank you very much for your reply. You have confirmed what I thought.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
967
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
7K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
6K