Is Archaeology Merely a Supplement to History?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheAzn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Opinions
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the relationship between archaeology and history, specifically questioning whether archaeology serves merely as a supplementary tool to historical analysis. Participants explore the effectiveness and status of archaeology in proving historical facts, as well as its ability to challenge historical textual evidence.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that archaeology is a "clumsy tool" for proving historical facts, suggesting a limited role in historical analysis.
  • There are claims that archaeology is viewed by some as only a supplement to history, raising questions about its status and reliability.
  • One participant challenges the notion that archaeology can disprove historical textual evidence, indicating a belief in the primacy of written records over archaeological findings.
  • Another participant requests mainstream peer-reviewed sources to support the claims made about archaeology's role, implying skepticism about the statements presented.
  • Concerns are raised about the validity of the discussion if reputable sources are not provided, with a suggestion to close the thread if such sources are lacking.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the status and effectiveness of archaeology in relation to history. There is no consensus on the role of archaeology, with some advocating for its supplementary nature while others question its validity altogether.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not provided specific sources or evidence to support their claims, leading to unresolved questions about the reliability of the statements made regarding archaeology's role in historical analysis.

TheAzn
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Archaeology is a bit of a clumsy tool when it comes proving historical facts. I believe that we can all agree with that.

However, there are some people who are even more extremist in their views and want Archaeology to be of a much lower status.

I am curious if you guys agree with the 2 quotes below?

1. "Archaeology is only a supplement to History."

2. "Archaeology is not only clumsy, it cannot be used to disprove historical textual evidence."
 
Science news on Phys.org
TheAzn said:
Archaeology is a bit of a clumsy tool when it comes proving historical facts. I believe that we can all agree with that.

However, there are some people who are even more extremist in their views and want Archaeology to be of a much lower status.

I am curious if you guys agree with the 2 quotes below?

1. "Archaeology is only a supplement to History."

2. "Archaeology is not only clumsy, it cannot be used to disprove historical textual evidence."
Please post the mainstream peer reviewed journal(s) where you found this.
 
Evo, I hope you plan on locking this thread when he can't provide any reputable source for such a statement.
 
phinds said:
Evo, I hope you plan on locking this thread when he can't provide any reputable source for such a statement.
Yes, and actually, since I know he can't. Thread closed.
 

Similar threads

Did English Really Precede Roman Britain?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Graduate Confused by Feynman sum over histories
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
History Historic science texts, and what they tell us about history of science
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Graduate Is QM Foundations Facing a Crisis?
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K
Graduate Quantum nonlocality and "spooky action at a distance"
  • · Replies 140 ·
5
Replies
140
Views
13K
Graduate Post-Selection: Pre-existing Correlations or Action At A Distance?
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
6K
Undergrad Einstein's View of Quantum Mechanics
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
9K
Undergrad What does Purcell actually say about electromagnetism and relativity?
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
7K
Understanding DRAM Refresh Operations
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
Is Alan Turing given too much credit when it comes to computers?
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K