Your thoughts about the entropy of coal?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the entropy of coal and whether it can be derived from its elemental composition, ash content, and Low Heat Value (LHV). Participants explore the relationship between these factors and the calculation of enthalpy during combustion, questioning if additional data is necessary for entropy assessment. The reference state for enthalpy calculations is typically set at a temperature of 273.15 K and a pressure of 1 atm, with heats of formation generally referenced at 298 K and 1 atm. The conversation highlights the complexities in accurately determining coal's entropy based on existing data. Overall, the inquiry emphasizes the need for clarity on the data required to assess entropy effectively.
maajdl
Gold Member
Messages
391
Reaction score
29
In the industry, coal and other fuels are typically represented by

- their C, H, O, N, S elemental composition for the combustible part​
- the composition of the ashes (SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3, ...)​
- the Low Heat Value (LHV) which is the heat that can be extracted from combustion product​

With these data, the "enthalpy" of coal can be calculated easily from the heat balance during combustion.

But what about the entropy of coal?
Do you think the entropy could be obtained on the basis of the same data listed here above.
Or is something missing? And how to fill the missing information then?

Just curiosity.

Thanks for your ideas ...

Michel
 
Science news on Phys.org
What reference state is used for the enthalpy of these substances (temperature, pressure)?
 
Usually T0=273.15 K , p0=1atm

Thanks for any suggestion

Michel
 
maajdl said:
Usually T0=273.15 K , p0=1atm

Thanks for any suggestion

Michel
Usually heats of formation are at 298 and 1 atm.
 
Thread 'Can somebody explain this: Planck's Law in action'
Plotted is the Irradiance over Wavelength. Please check for logarithmic scaling. As you can see, there are 4 curves. Blue AM 0 as measured yellow Planck for 5777 K green Planck for, 5777 K after free space expansion red Planck for 1.000.000 K To me the idea of a gamma-Ray-source on earth, below the magnetic field, which protects life on earth from solar radiation, in an intensity, which is way way way outer hand, makes no sense to me. If they really get these high temperatures realized in...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
31K