YouTube Classics, Part Deux

  • Thread starter Thread starter lisab
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Youtube
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
828 replies · 87K views
OmCheeto said:
ps. Do they not teach FBI agents about the "safety switch" on a gun? Seriously. It's been 40 years since I last took a class on handguns, and even I remember that.
some Glocks don't have one. They assume the user means it when he pulls the trigger.

https://us.glock.com/technology/safe-action

upload_2018-6-3_13-43-18.png


Play the video back at 1/4 speed and clearly it goes off when he grabs it, and his finger looks to be on the trigger..

I prefer 1911's myself.



old jim
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-6-3_13-43-18.png
    upload_2018-6-3_13-43-18.png
    61.3 KB · Views: 502
Last edited:
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nsaspook and OmCheeto
Physics news on Phys.org
jim hardy said:
some Glocks don't have one. ...
:oldsurprised:

That just sounds insane to me.
Play it back at 1/4 speed and clearly it goes off when he grabs it, and his finger looks to be on the trigger..
Don't need to. Can't imagine a gun going off otherwise.
I prefer 1911's myself.
That was the gun I was trained on.


old jim

Nice production.

btw, did you see the video from Hawaii the other day?

Guns.
Some people should not be allowed to own them...



From the context of the video, the shooter did not know who his neighbors were.
 
nsaspook said:
They should arrest him, those dance moves should be banned forever.
It wasn't that bad, they all seemed to have had a blast.
 
OmCheeto said:
ps. Sorry. I'm pretty much "gun" illiterate. They are the least of my interests.

The folks who have to approve any gun purchase from a dealer. It's done in a few minutes by phone call. Shoulda stopped the Parkland kid but that's another whole story and covered elsewhere.

Sorry for the undefined acronym..
 
Look at this guy's clothes. (I posted a link instead of embedding the video so that the timing works properly since it doesn't work with embedded videos)

If you are not on limited bandwidth, play it at the highest resolution you can and at full screen.

Time 2:23. Take a look at the guy's coat. That fibre weave at the top of the back is Gabardine :oldlove:. The one in the cuffs is a smaller weave, but also Gabardine. The cuffs look even better because the weave is smaller. I love Gabardine. It's just awesome.
 
Last edited:
A very handy little kit... :smile:
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark


I was looking for that song for a long time and I didn't know the name. Time (0:23)

Now I know it is Bethoven Symphony No 9. The music that plays when you are doing a difficult math exam, yet you know you are acing it and you are confident in your work.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42
Neil deGrasse Tyson on Star Wars and Star Trek, very funny! :biggrin:
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42 and collinsmark
Kids react to old computer, very funny! :biggrin:
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: OmCheeto
jim hardy said:
Needs pitch control, doesn't it ?

I assume a crash landing is what prompted the pretty girl with pony tail to run that direction ?

It just needs to be faster so the time between when the front tires start to drop (alter path) from gravity thus imparting angular momentum while the rear tires are still on the ground is minimized.


Just some good old boys, never meaning no harm...

https://www.barrietoday.com/local-n...cks-crashes-into-parking-lot-8-photos-1029716
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy
nsaspook said:
It just needs to be faster so the time between when the front tires start to drop (alter path) from gravity thus imparting angular momentum while the rear tires are still on the ground is minimized.


Just some good old boys, never meaning no harm...

I don't think that is the clue. It looks as if the center of gravity is mostly given by the weight of the motor, in which case a faster car and thus wider jump will result in an even steeper angle.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu
Just before it showed up on the right, there was a bright flash. Maybe it was Doc Brown coming back from the future.
Marty warned him that the reentry was a little rough. :oldtongue:
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: OmCheeto, jim hardy, DennisN and 2 others
fresh_42 said:
I don't think that is the clue. It looks as if the center of gravity is mostly given by the weight of the motor, in which case a faster car and thus wider jump will result in an even steeper angle.

Maybe but from what I've been told the center of gravity on a Tesla is centralized pretty low from the bulky battery being centered low under the car. It's really hard to roll over.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy
Borg said:
Just before it showed up on the right, there was a bright flash. Maybe it was Doc Brown coming back from the future.
Marty warned him that the reentry was a little rough. :oldtongue:

Exactly what I was thinking too! :smile:
"Where we are going we don't need any roads."
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy
Hmmm.

Looks like they could use a more robust rear wheel attachment.
upload_2018-8-31_14-30-22.png
nsaspook said:
It just needs to be faster so the time between when the front tires start to drop (alter path) from gravity thus imparting angular momentum while the rear tires are still on the ground is minimized.
Imagining a free body diagram

If the front wheels are clear of the ground
and the rear springs are still compressed transmitting downward force to the ground
then the moment between rear wheels and CG apply torque to pitch the vehicle nose down.

so i think @nsaspook has a point.

Moral:
If you're going to do jumps, get some rear shock absorbers that are really slow in the extend direction.
Maybe from a vehicle with spring rate 3X heavier than yours.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-8-31_14-30-22.png
    upload_2018-8-31_14-30-22.png
    17.6 KB · Views: 813

Attachments

  • uction.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Fcard%2Fimage%2F836902%2F3c66f1ca-6724-4c6b-9926-a6e9880b25cb.png
    uction.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Fcard%2Fimage%2F836902%2F3c66f1ca-6724-4c6b-9926-a6e9880b25cb.png
    150.5 KB · Views: 471
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: OmCheeto
Okay i see. That's what the Tesla driver saw a he approached the railroad tracks.

Here's where i think the security camera was ?
flyingesla.jpg


If he was stopped at that traffic light that's remarkable acceleration. I guess Teslas are known for that...
but 0 to 99mph in 260 feet ?

old jim
 

Attachments

  • flyingesla.jpg
    flyingesla.jpg
    49.2 KB · Views: 467
you calc 'em

v = at (eq1)
and
s = at2/2 (eq 2)

if s =260 ft from traffic light to railroad track (i got that from google map)
and the Tesla is capable of acceleraton a = 100mph / 4.2sec = (146.67 ft/sec) / (4.2 sec ) = 34.92 ft/sec2
then to go 260 feet would take how long?
Rearranging (eq 2),
t = √(2s/a) = √(520 / 34.92) = √14.89 = 3.859 seconds
at which time eq (1) says its speed v=at would be 34.92 X 3.859 = 134.75 ft/sec = ~91.9 mph

Not quite ten percent short of Wired magazine's 99.8mph estimate from the video.

So it's plausible he started at that traffic light.
I sure hope he wasn't running through them at 90+ mph. You wouldn't hear an electric coming - "It purrs like a kitten with no lake pipe roar"...

old jim