YouTube Classics, Part Deux

  • Thread starter Thread starter lisab
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Youtube
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The thread explores various humorous and entertaining YouTube videos, including performances, reactions, and commentary on different subjects. The scope includes light-hearted content, social commentary, and personal anecdotes related to the videos shared.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants share videos of trombone performances and express enjoyment of the music.
  • There are multiple mentions of a jackrabbit's athleticism, with suggestions that it could be signed by a football or gymnastics team.
  • A participant reflects on a video involving a fire extinguisher, sharing their perspective as an ex-fireman.
  • Questions arise about the behavior of people in stopped cars, with one participant suggesting a humorous interpretation using time displacement technology.
  • Several participants share links to videos that evoke nostalgia or humor, including historical and comedic content.
  • There are discussions about the physics of motion and the impact of natural disasters, with specific examples provided.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally share a light-hearted tone and engage with each other's posts, but there is no clear consensus on the interpretations or implications of the videos discussed. Multiple viewpoints and interpretations remain present throughout the thread.

Contextual Notes

Some posts reference specific moments in videos that may require viewing for full context. The humor and commentary are subjective and depend on individual interpretations of the content shared.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in humorous video content, social commentary, and light-hearted discussions about various topics may find this thread engaging.

  • #271
OmCheeto said:
ps. Do they not teach FBI agents about the "safety switch" on a gun? Seriously. It's been 40 years since I last took a class on handguns, and even I remember that.
some Glocks don't have one. They assume the user means it when he pulls the trigger.

https://us.glock.com/technology/safe-action

upload_2018-6-3_13-43-18.png


Play the video back at 1/4 speed and clearly it goes off when he grabs it, and his finger looks to be on the trigger..

I prefer 1911's myself.



old jim
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-6-3_13-43-18.png
    upload_2018-6-3_13-43-18.png
    61.3 KB · Views: 481
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nsaspook and OmCheeto
Science news on Phys.org
  • #272
jim hardy said:
I prefer 1911's myself.
Ditto.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy
  • #273
jim hardy said:
some Glocks don't have one. ...
:oldsurprised:

That just sounds insane to me.
Play it back at 1/4 speed and clearly it goes off when he grabs it, and his finger looks to be on the trigger..
Don't need to. Can't imagine a gun going off otherwise.
I prefer 1911's myself.
That was the gun I was trained on.


old jim

Nice production.

btw, did you see the video from Hawaii the other day?

Guns.
Some people should not be allowed to own them...



From the context of the video, the shooter did not know who his neighbors were.
 
  • #274
Look up Idiots with guns on youtube. Hilarious, but one has to be prepared to hear a couple of ugly words. I like the one who actually looked down the barrel of his rifle. Beside the obvious stupidity, how did he expect to view something without light?
 
  • #275
nsaspook said:
They should arrest him, those dance moves should be banned forever.
It wasn't that bad, they all seemed to have had a blast.
 
  • #276
OmCheeto said:
video from Hawaii the other day?
Was that the video ?

Sure looks like an over-reaction. With all those witnesses the big guy could easily wind up in the 'NICS Denied' database.
 
  • #278
OmCheeto said:
ps. Sorry. I'm pretty much "gun" illiterate. They are the least of my interests.

The folks who have to approve any gun purchase from a dealer. It's done in a few minutes by phone call. Shoulda stopped the Parkland kid but that's another whole story and covered elsewhere.

Sorry for the undefined acronym..
 
  • #279
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vela, OmCheeto and Craftek_Ana
  • #280
Look at this guy's clothes. (I posted a link instead of embedding the video so that the timing works properly since it doesn't work with embedded videos)

If you are not on limited bandwidth, play it at the highest resolution you can and at full screen.

Time 2:23. Take a look at the guy's coat. That fibre weave at the top of the back is Gabardine :oldlove:. The one in the cuffs is a smaller weave, but also Gabardine. The cuffs look even better because the weave is smaller. I love Gabardine. It's just awesome.
 
Last edited:
  • #281
The aerodynamics of flying portable toilets.
 
  • #282
A very handy little kit... :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark
  • #283
DennisN said:
A very handy little kit... :smile:

... and we call this "pocket knife" over here!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DennisN
  • #284


I was looking for that song for a long time and I didn't know the name. Time (0:23)

Now I know it is Bethoven Symphony No 9. The music that plays when you are doing a difficult math exam, yet you know you are acing it and you are confident in your work.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42
  • #285
Neil deGrasse Tyson on Star Wars and Star Trek, very funny! :biggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42 and collinsmark
  • #286
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DennisN and OmCheeto
  • #287
Kids react to old computer, very funny! :biggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: OmCheeto
  • #288
DennisN said:
Kids react to old computer, very funny! :biggrin:

And if you hand them your old car key the time they get their driver license, they will push it like mad and wonder why the car doesn't open.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nuuskur and DennisN
  • #289
Tesla flying car option.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: OmCheeto
  • #290
nsaspook said:
Tesla flying car option.

Needs pitch control, doesn't it ?

I assume a crash landing is what prompted the pretty girl with pony tail to run that direction ?
 
  • #291
jim hardy said:
Needs pitch control, doesn't it ?

I assume a crash landing is what prompted the pretty girl with pony tail to run that direction ?

It just needs to be faster so the time between when the front tires start to drop (alter path) from gravity thus imparting angular momentum while the rear tires are still on the ground is minimized.


Just some good old boys, never meaning no harm...

https://www.barrietoday.com/local-n...cks-crashes-into-parking-lot-8-photos-1029716
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy
  • #292
nsaspook said:
It just needs to be faster so the time between when the front tires start to drop (alter path) from gravity thus imparting angular momentum while the rear tires are still on the ground is minimized.


Just some good old boys, never meaning no harm...

I don't think that is the clue. It looks as if the center of gravity is mostly given by the weight of the motor, in which case a faster car and thus wider jump will result in an even steeper angle.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu
  • #293
Just before it showed up on the right, there was a bright flash. Maybe it was Doc Brown coming back from the future.
Marty warned him that the reentry was a little rough. :oldtongue:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: OmCheeto, jim hardy, DennisN and 2 others
  • #294
fresh_42 said:
I don't think that is the clue. It looks as if the center of gravity is mostly given by the weight of the motor, in which case a faster car and thus wider jump will result in an even steeper angle.

Maybe but from what I've been told the center of gravity on a Tesla is centralized pretty low from the bulky battery being centered low under the car. It's really hard to roll over.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy
  • #295
Borg said:
Just before it showed up on the right, there was a bright flash. Maybe it was Doc Brown coming back from the future.
Marty warned him that the reentry was a little rough. :oldtongue:

Exactly what I was thinking too! :smile:
"Where we are going we don't need any roads."
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy
  • #296
Hmmm.

Looks like they could use a more robust rear wheel attachment.
upload_2018-8-31_14-30-22.png
nsaspook said:
It just needs to be faster so the time between when the front tires start to drop (alter path) from gravity thus imparting angular momentum while the rear tires are still on the ground is minimized.
Imagining a free body diagram

If the front wheels are clear of the ground
and the rear springs are still compressed transmitting downward force to the ground
then the moment between rear wheels and CG apply torque to pitch the vehicle nose down.

so i think @nsaspook has a point.

Moral:
If you're going to do jumps, get some rear shock absorbers that are really slow in the extend direction.
Maybe from a vehicle with spring rate 3X heavier than yours.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-8-31_14-30-22.png
    upload_2018-8-31_14-30-22.png
    17.6 KB · Views: 792
  • #297

Attachments

  • uction.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Fcard%2Fimage%2F836902%2F3c66f1ca-6724-4c6b-9926-a6e9880b25cb.png
    uction.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Fcard%2Fimage%2F836902%2F3c66f1ca-6724-4c6b-9926-a6e9880b25cb.png
    150.5 KB · Views: 451
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: OmCheeto
  • #298
Okay i see. That's what the Tesla driver saw a he approached the railroad tracks.

Here's where i think the security camera was ?
flyingesla.jpg


If he was stopped at that traffic light that's remarkable acceleration. I guess Teslas are known for that...
but 0 to 99mph in 260 feet ?

old jim
 

Attachments

  • flyingesla.jpg
    flyingesla.jpg
    49.2 KB · Views: 452
  • #300
you calc 'em

v = at (eq1)
and
s = at2/2 (eq 2)

if s =260 ft from traffic light to railroad track (i got that from google map)
and the Tesla is capable of acceleraton a = 100mph / 4.2sec = (146.67 ft/sec) / (4.2 sec ) = 34.92 ft/sec2
then to go 260 feet would take how long?
Rearranging (eq 2),
t = √(2s/a) = √(520 / 34.92) = √14.89 = 3.859 seconds
at which time eq (1) says its speed v=at would be 34.92 X 3.859 = 134.75 ft/sec = ~91.9 mph

Not quite ten percent short of Wired magazine's 99.8mph estimate from the video.

So it's plausible he started at that traffic light.
I sure hope he wasn't running through them at 90+ mph. You wouldn't hear an electric coming - "It purrs like a kitten with no lake pipe roar"...

old jim
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
4K
  • · Replies 227 ·
8
Replies
227
Views
13K
  • · Replies 79 ·
3
Replies
79
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 325 ·
11
Replies
325
Views
30K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
83
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
498