Z-bosons as Hawking radiation from BH

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the hypothesis that Z bosons, as massive particles, contribute to Hawking radiation from black holes (BH), potentially altering the expected black-body spectrum. It is established that Z bosons do not experience redshift like photons and can fall back into the BH, leading to a distortion in the emitted spectrum. The decay of Z bosons into photons is noted as highly unlikely, with a predicted decay width of only 1.35 eV, suggesting that the total Hawking radiation does not conform to a traditional black-body spectrum. The conversation concludes that while the effect of Z bosons is minimal, it raises questions about the applicability of Planck's law at high energies.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hawking radiation mechanisms
  • Knowledge of particle physics, specifically Z bosons
  • Familiarity with black-body radiation and its spectrum
  • Basic principles of quantum field theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Z bosons in quantum field theory
  • Study the Scharnhorst effect and its relevance to particle physics
  • Investigate the conditions under which black holes emit Hawking radiation
  • Explore Planck's law of black-body radiation in high-energy contexts
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, cosmologists, and researchers interested in black hole thermodynamics, particle physics, and the implications of massive particles in quantum radiation processes.

tzimie
Messages
256
Reaction score
27
Please check my logic.

1. Hawking mechanism should give birth not only to photons, but also to their heavier analogs, Z for example.
2. Contrary to photons, massive Z bosons are not gradually red shifted, low energy Z simply fall back to BH, so the "red" part of the black-body spectrum of Z is cut. It is also distorted because Z has non-zero invariant mass.
3. Finally Z decay to photons, but the spectrum of these photons carry the "birth defect" - missing "red" part of the spectrum.
4. As a result, total Hawking radiation from BH has NOT a black-body spectrum because of massive particles.

I understand that effect is tiny, but is my logic flawed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tzimie said:
2. Contrary to photons, massive Z bosons are not gradually red shifted, low energy Z simply fall back to BH, so the "red" part of the black-body spectrum of Z is cut. It is also distorted because Z has non-zero invariant mass.
Distorted as in "non-existent" - unless the black hole is so small that its temperature gets comparable to 90 GeV. Such a small black hole will emit all particles lighter than the Z as well.
tzimie said:
3. Finally Z decay to photons
That decay is very unlikely, it hasn't been observed so far. It would need at least three photons and a loop. A very old paper (before the top discovery) predicts a partial decay width of only 1.35 eV, or roughly 1 decay in a billion.
tzimie said:
4. As a result, total Hawking radiation from BH has NOT a black-body spectrum because of massive particles.
It has a black-body spectrum by definition of that spectrum. At very high temperatures massive particles become part of that spectrum, if you have a possible decay you also have the possible recombination.
 
mfb said:
1 Distorted as in "non-existent" - unless the black hole is so small that its temperature gets comparable to 90 GeV.
2 It has a black-body spectrum by definition of that spectrum. At very high temperatures massive particles become part of that spectrum, if you have a possible decay you also have the possible recombination.

1 I understand, this is like Scharnhorst effect, the value of effect is irrelevant.
2 Hm...may be this is the answer...
So Planck's law of black-body radiation is valid only on the low-energy limit?
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K