Zee and Georgi Group Theory books

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the suitability of Zee's Group Theory textbook compared to Georgi's "Lie Algebras in Particle Physics" for a course on Group Theory. Users express concerns about the depth and clarity of Zee's books, particularly in Quantum Field Theory (QFT), suggesting they may not adequately prepare students for examinations at the level of Georgi's text. While Zee's General Relativity book is viewed more favorably, it is noted that his QFT book lacks the necessary detail for beginners. Users recommend using Lancaster and Blundell's QFT as a supplementary resource alongside Zee's materials.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Group Theory concepts
  • Familiarity with Quantum Field Theory (QFT)
  • Knowledge of Lie Algebras
  • Experience with supplementary academic texts in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Lancaster and Blundell's QFT for the Gifted Amateur" for foundational QFT concepts
  • Explore Georgi's "Lie Algebras in Particle Physics" for advanced group theory applications
  • Examine Zee's General Relativity textbook for comparative analysis
  • Investigate the pedagogical approaches of various physics textbooks
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those studying Group Theory and Quantum Field Theory, as well as anyone seeking to evaluate the effectiveness of different physics textbooks for academic courses.

Joker93
Messages
502
Reaction score
37
Hello.
I will be attending a course on Group theory and the book that the professor suggests is Georgi's Lie Algebras in Particle Physics.
As I liked Zee's book on General Relativity, I thought that it would be a blast to also use his Group theory textbook for the course.
Problem is that I don't know if the level of Zee's book matches that of Georgi's(I wouldn't want to solve exercises from Zee that are at a lower level of that of the examination which will be at the same level as Georgi's book).
Any help is appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know Zee's book. Georgi's is pretty good. Since Zee's QFT book I'm very prejudiced against Zee's textbooks since it was only proving the fact that a "nutshell" is too small to seriously cover even the basics of QFT.
 
vanhees71 said:
I don't know Zee's book. Georgi's is pretty good. Since Zee's QFT book I'm very prejudiced against Zee's textbooks since it was only proving the fact that a "nutshell" is too small to seriously cover even the basics of QFT.
I think his GR book is much better. That said, Zee stated that his QFT book's purpose is to just provide a gentle introduction to just entice its readers.
In any way, thanks for your input.
 
But it's not a gentle introduction! It's trying to provide too much in too little space and thus doesn't explain the many subtle points exactly for beginners. It's an amusing read for someone who already knows the subject, but to understand QFT as a beginner you need a bit more accuracy.
 
vanhees71 said:
But it's not a gentle introduction! It's trying to provide too much in too little space and thus doesn't explain the many subtle points exactly for beginners. It's an amusing read for someone who already knows the subject, but to understand QFT as a beginner you need a bit more accuracy.
It's fun though. You are right, and that's why I preferred using Lancaster and Blundell's QFT for the gifted amateur when I wanted to get a basic idea of what QFT is.
But then I started using them together and it was really helpful. So, as a supplementary book, it seems good to me.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier and vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
692
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K