Zeeman Effect - average shift is zero?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the Zeeman Effect, specifically the first-order energy shift and the degeneracy after perturbation. Part (a) is solved, but part (b) raises questions about the average energy shift being zero despite the individual shifts not being zero. The degeneracy is lifted due to perturbation, leading to different contributions from states with angular momenta j = l + 1/2 and j = l - 1/2. The average shift ultimately becomes zero when considering the weights of the states, which are determined by their respective degeneracies. The conclusion is that the average perturbation can indeed be zero when accounting for these factors.
unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



2zgd7hw.png


Part (a):Find the first order shift in energy
Part(b): What is the degeneracy after perturbation? Find Show average shift in energy is zero.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I've shown part (a), the troubling part is part (b).

Part (b)
With the perturbation, the degeneracy is lifted. Hence degeneracy = 0.

For ##j=l+\frac{1}{2}##, shift is ##\Delta E_+ = \frac{1}{4}mc^2 \alpha^4\frac{(l+\frac{1}{2})(l+\frac{3}{2}) - l(l+1) - \frac{3}{4}}{n^3 l(l+\frac{1}{2})(l+1)}##

For ##j=l-\frac{1}{2}##, shift is ##\Delta E_- = \frac{1}{4}mc^2 \alpha^4\frac{(l-\frac{1}{2})(l+\frac{1}{2}) - l(l+1) - \frac{3}{4}}{n^3 l(l+\frac{1}{2})(l+1)}##.

The total perturbation is given by the sum of positive perturbation and negative perturbation:

\delta E= \Delta E_+ + \Delta E_-
\delta E = \frac{mc^2 \alpha^4}{2n^3 l}

Clearly, the average perturbation for a given n and l is not zero. How does it even become zero then?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
j = l + 1/2 and j = l - 1/2 have different degeneracies. They contribute different weights to the average.
 
Last edited:
dauto said:
j = l + 1/2 and j = i - 1/2 have different degeneracies. They contribute different weights to the average.

Each has a weight of ##2l-1##?
 
unscientific said:
Each has a weight of ##2l-1##?

No, they have weights 2j+1 for two different values of j
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
dauto said:
No, they have weights 2j+1 for two different values of j

Oh yeah, because when two angular momenta ##j_1## and ##j_2## are combined, each state in ##J = j_1 + j_2## ranges from -J to +J in steps of 1.

I keep forgetting that this is a two-angular momentum problem, not a simple one with only spin.

\delta E = (2j_+ +1)\Delta E_+ + (2j_- +1)\Delta E_-

I worked it out, and it appears to be zero.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
46
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K