Zero derivative on a strictly increasing function (not piecewise)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding strictly increasing functions whose derivatives equal zero at specific points. Participants are tasked with identifying one function with two such points and another with infinitely many, while ensuring these functions are continuous and not piecewise defined.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the characteristics of polynomial functions and their derivatives, questioning the feasibility of achieving the desired properties with them. There are discussions about manipulating trigonometric functions and integrating positive functions to meet the criteria. Some participants suggest examining the behavior of derivatives and the implications of polynomial degree on the number of stationary points.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with participants sharing insights and questioning assumptions about function types and their derivatives. Some guidance has been offered regarding polynomial degrees and the nature of increasing functions, but no consensus has been reached on specific functions that meet the criteria.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering constraints such as the requirement for functions to be strictly increasing and continuous across all reals, as well as the implications of having derivatives equal to zero at specified points.

quincyboy7
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find a function, strictly increasing, whose derivative equals zero at TWO places. Find another such function whose derivative equals zero at infinitely many places. These should not be piecewise and should be continuous on all reals.

Homework Equations


f(x)=x^3 has one such spot, at x=0.


The Attempt at a Solution



I can't imagine the answer is a polynomial, since the derivatives of those will have x terms that can equal 0 at only one place (think x^3, x^5, x^7, etc.). Any manipulations of such polynomials make them not strictly increasing, which is another problem.

Sine and cose functions probably can't be made strictly increasing by any manipulations. Inverse functions don't have derivatives equaling zero, I don't think.

E^x and sqrt(x) are both not continuous on both reals and don't have derivative zero anywhere.

I just can't think of anything more in terms of function "families" that could work...any pointers would be great
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi quincyboy7! :wink:
quincyboy7 said:
… I can't imagine the answer is a polynomial, since the derivatives of those will have x terms that can equal 0 at only one place (think x^3, x^5, x^7, etc.). Any manipulations of such polynomials make them not strictly increasing, which is another problem.

that's right
Sine and cose functions probably can't be made strictly increasing by any manipulations.

how about stretching one of them out by adding another function to it? :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
how about stretching one of them out by adding another function to it? :smile:

Well, the function would still decrease even if it wasn't periodic, like cosx+x, right? There's no way sinx + FUNCTION doesn't go down at some interval, right? Even if that interval isn't regular...

EDIT: OH! The derivative of cosx+x is -sinx+1, which is 0 at infinitely many places and never negative! Thanks SO much.

But how would I get one that's "controllable" i.e. f'(x)=0 at only TWO places?
 
Last edited:
min [d/dx (sinx + f(x))] = … ? :wink:
 
Think about what the graph of the derivative of the function would look like.

BTW you can find an increasing polynomial with zero derivative at any finite number of points; it must be odd, and to have n such points must be of degree 2n+1 or higher. (You see why?). So for your first question, you need a quintic at least.
 
henry_m said:
Think about what the graph of the derivative of the function would look like.

BTW you can find an increasing polynomial with zero derivative at any finite number of points; it must be odd, and to have n such points must be of degree 2n+1 or higher. (You see why?). So for your first question, you need a quintic at least.

I understand why it must be odd, but I don't quite get how you got the 2n+1 expression, even though it seems intuitive.

Alright, let me try to integrate a function that's positive everywhere and zero at 2 places...like x^2(x-1)^2, which will be INT (x^4-2x^3+x^2) or x^5/5 -x^4/2 + x^3/3...does that work?

EDIT: Here's how I think you got the 2n+1...the derivative equals zero at n places, but never crosses the x-axis so the form of the derivative is (x-n1)^2 (at least, could be 4, 6, 8, etc.) (x-n2)^2 etc. The order of the derivative will thus be at least 2n and the integral will be 2n+1 at least.
 
quincyboy7 said:
I understand why it must be odd, but I don't quite get how you got the 2n+1 expression, even though it seems intuitive.

Alright, let me try to integrate a function that's positive everywhere and zero at 2 places...like x^2(x-1)^2, which will be INT (x^4-2x^3+x^2) or x^5/5 -x^4/2 + x^3/3...does that work?

EDIT: Here's how I think you got the 2n+1...the derivative equals zero at n places, but never crosses the x-axis so the form of the derivative is (x-n1)^2 (at least, could be 4, 6, 8, etc.) (x-n2)^2 etc. The order of the derivative will thus be at least 2n and the integral will be 2n+1 at least.

Exactly!

In fact, by thinking about the derivatives like this, you can get even nastier things. For example, you can have a function which is strictly increasing, differentiable everywhere and has infinitely many stationary points in a finite interval:
[tex]f(x)=\int_0^x \sin(1/t) dt +x[/tex]
[The tricky thing here is showing it's differentiable at the origin.]
 
quincyboy7 said:
...
I can't imagine the answer is a polynomial, since the derivatives of those will have x terms that can equal 0 at only one place (think x^3, x^5, x^7, etc.). Any manipulations of such polynomials make them not strictly increasing, which is another problem.
...
If f(x) = x3, then f'(x) = 3x2.

Look at g'(x) = (x-1)2(x+1)2, which is zero at x = ±1, and positive otherwise.

Find g(x) by integration. Of course, g'(x) may be written as g'(x) = (x2-1)2 = x4 -2x2 +1 .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
18K