Zero Integral Implies Zero Function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical theorem stating that if a continuous function \( h: \Omega \to \mathbb{R} \) satisfies \( \int_{B(x_0,r)} h(x) \, dx = 0 \) for all balls \( B(x_0,r) \subseteq \Omega \), then \( h(x) = 0 \) for all \( x \in \Omega \). Participants suggest proving the contrapositive: if \( h \) is not identically zero, then there exists an \( x_0 \) and \( r > 0 \) such that \( \int_{B(x_0,r)} h(x) \, dx \) is nonzero. The proof utilizes the continuity of \( h \) and properties of integrals over small neighborhoods.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of continuous functions in real analysis
  • Familiarity with the properties of integrals
  • Knowledge of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (FTC)
  • Ability to work with neighborhoods in metric spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (FTC) in depth
  • Explore the properties of integrals of continuous functions
  • Learn about metric spaces and neighborhoods
  • Investigate the concept of contrapositive proofs in mathematical logic
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying real analysis, and anyone interested in understanding the implications of continuity and integrals in mathematical functions.

Julio1
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
If $h: \Omega\to \mathbb{R}$ is continuous and $\displaystyle \int\limits_{B(x_0,r)}h(x)\, dx=0$, for all $B(x_0,r)\subseteq \Omega$, then $h(x)=0, \, \forall x\in \Omega.$Hello MHB, is an problem that I don't solve :(. Help me please or any hints :). Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This looks to me a lot like the Fundamental Theorem of the Calculus (FTC). You're given information about the integral of a continuous function, and asked to prove something about the function. Could you try to get the "if" part of the FTC satisfied, maybe?
 
Hi Julio,

Prove the contrapositive, i.e., suppose $h$ is not identically zero, and prove that there is an $x_0\in \Omega$ and $r > 0$ such that $\int_{B(x_0,r)} h(x)\, dx$ is nonzero.

If $h$ is not identically zero, there is an $x_0$ such that $h(x_0) \neq 0$. Thus $|h(x_0)|/2 > 0$; by continuity of $h$ at $x_0$, there exists $r > 0$ such that $|h(x) - h(x_0)| < |h(x_0)|/2$ for all $x \in B(x_0,r)$. Thus

$$h(x_0) - \frac{|h(x_0)|}{2} < h(x) < h(x_0) + \frac{|h(x_0)|}{2}$$

for all $x\in B(x_0,r)$. If $h(x_0) > 0$, then the latter inequalities give $h(x_0)/2 < h(x) < 3h(x_0)/2$ for $x\in B(x_0,r)$. Hence

$$0 < \int_{B(x_0,r)} \frac{h(x_0)}{2}\, dx < \int_{B(x_0,r)} h(x)\, dx.$$

If $h(x_0) < 0$, you can show

$$0 > \int_{B(x_0,r)} \frac{h(x_0)}{2}\, dx > \int_{B(x_0,r)} h(x)\, dx.$$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K