Zero Integrals: The Theory Behind Evaluating Expressions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the theory of zero integrals, specifically addressing the conditions under which an integral of a closed path equates to zero. It is established that while a closed loop integral can yield a zero result, the integrand does not necessarily have to be zero unless specific conditions are met. A key example provided is from the Euler-Lagrange equations, where the integral of a product involving an arbitrary function leads to the conclusion that the non-arbitrary function must be identically zero for the integral to hold true. This principle can be extended to closed paths under similar reasoning.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus
  • Familiarity with the Euler-Lagrange equations
  • Knowledge of conservative forces in physics
  • Concept of arbitrary functions in mathematical analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of the Euler-Lagrange equations
  • Explore properties of conservative forces and their integrals
  • Investigate the implications of closed path integrals in vector calculus
  • Learn about the role of arbitrary functions in variational calculus
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying calculus or variational principles who seek a deeper understanding of integrals and their properties in theoretical contexts.

hasanhabibul
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
what is the theory behind ...if close integral of a expression is zero..then the expression is itself zero
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you mean that if we have an integral whose path is a closed loop that is equal to zero then the integrand must be zero? If that is so then we cannot say that it is true in general, there need to be addtional conditions. For example, the integral of a conservative force over a closed loop will be zero but the integrand, the force, does not necessarily need to be zero itself over the integration path.

I cannot remember all of the exact conditions where it follows that the integrand has to be identically zero. One example is the Euler-Lagrange equations, in their derivation we can come to the point where,

[tex]\int_0^1 F(x)\eta(x)dx = 0[/tex]

Here, the function \eta(x) is any arbitrary function that enforces the boundary conditions \eta(0)=\eta(1)=0. Since \eta(x) is arbitrary between the endpoints of the path then we conclude that the integrand, F(x), must be identically zero. This is not the exact case that you requested since it is not a closed path but one could extend the same thinking to a closed path.

That is, if we have an integrand that is the product of two functions, one that is an arbitrary function, then for the integral to be zero the the non-arbitrary function must be zero over the entire integration path. Thus, the integrand itself must be zero.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
816
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K